Cortical focusing is an alternative explanation for improved sensory acuity on an amputation stump

The ability to localize a sensory stimulus on the body surface (locognosia) has been investigated in normal subjects in a quest to find an explanation for the reported findings of improved sensory acuity on an amputation stump. We have shown that when attending to a smaller area of skin, during the testing procedure, locognosia improves (P < 0.001) by a similar degree to that seen in amputees. Such selective attention is likely to occur in upper limb amputees as they have a reduced area of skin on which to focus during sensory testing. This represents a further explanation for improved sensory acuity on an amputation stump without implicating plasticity of connections within the somatosensory cortex.

[1]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Topographic reorganization of somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 in adult monkeys following restricted deafferentation , 1983, Neuroscience.

[2]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. , 1992, Science.

[3]  R Kawashima,et al.  Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: closing the "mind's eye". , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  F. E. Bloom,et al.  Sensory maps in the human brain , 1994, Nature.

[5]  P. Roland.  Cortical regulation of selective attention in man. A regional cerebral blood flow study. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Marshall,et al.  Thumb in cheek? Sensory reorganization and perceptual plasticity after limb amputation. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[7]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[8]  W. Schady,et al.  M13 Lack of functional plasticity in the somatosensory system after nerve injury , 1996 .

[9]  T. Elbert,et al.  Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation , 1995, Nature.

[10]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[11]  J. Kaas.  Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  William B. Haber,et al.  REACTIONS TO LOSS OF LIMB: PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS , 1958, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Raichle,et al.  Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation , 1995, Nature.

[14]  Phantom face: conscious correlate of neural reorganization after removal of primary sensory neurones , 1996, Neuroreport.

[15]  G M Hathout,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human Rolandic cortex. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[16]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Responsiveness of the somatosensory system after nerve injury and amputation in the human hand , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[17]  D. Rasmusson,et al.  Reorganization of raccoon somatosensory cortex following removal of the fifth digit , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.