“You Tweet Like a Girl!”

We investigate the Twitter activity of all congressional candidates leading up to the 2012 U.S. House elections to assess whether there are significant differences in the tone and content of the tweets from male and female candidates. We argue that the electoral environment will have a significant effect over whether candidates engage in negative tweeting, address political issues, and discuss so-called “women’s issues” on Twitter. We find that gender has both a direct and contextual effect on candidates’ communication style on Twitter. Female candidates tweet significantly more “attack-style” messages than their male counterparts, discuss policy issues at a significantly higher rate, and women representatives focus more on “women’s issues.” We also find strong contextual effects in races with more female candidates: There is significantly more tweeting about political issues as well as significantly more negative attack-style tweets. However, with more female candidates, the number of tweets about “women’s issues” declines.

[1]  K. Fridkin,et al.  The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns , 2009, Politics & Gender.

[2]  C. Mueller.  The Politics of the gender gap : the social construction of political influence , 1990 .

[3]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the Election Cycle and Beyond. , 2006 .

[4]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  M. Swers.  The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress , 2002 .

[6]  J. Koch.  Candidate gender and assessments of senate candidates , 1999 .

[7]  Paul S. Herrnson,et al.  Women Running “as Women”: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies , 2003, The Journal of Politics.

[8]  J. Newman,et al.  Sex As a Political Variable: Women As Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections , 1997 .

[9]  K. Fridkin,et al.  Bad for Men, Better for Women: The Impact of Stereotypes During Negative Campaigns , 2009 .

[10]  S. M. Rosenwasser,et al.  Attitudes Toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Presidential Candidate-A Research Note' , 1988 .

[11]  A. Appleton,et al.  Party Response to Environmental Change , 1997 .

[12]  A. Chadha.  Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections , 1997 .

[13]  M. Leeper.  The Impact of Prejudice On Female Candidates: , 1991 .

[14]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns , 2014, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[15]  E. Plutzer.  It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office , 2006, Politics & Gender.

[16]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[17]  Jennifer L. Lawless.  Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era , 2004 .

[18]  Kim Fridkin Kahn,et al.  WOMEN CANDIDATES IN THE NEWS: AN EXAMINATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN U.S. SENATE CAMPAIGN COVERAGE , 1991 .

[19]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[20]  Chingching Chang,et al.  Effects of Gender Schematic Processing on the Reception of Political Commercials for Men and Women Candidates , 1995 .

[21]  Kevin M. Wagner,et al.  Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics , 2013 .

[22]  G. Matthews,et al.  Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics , 1993 .

[23]  GueorguievaVassia.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[24]  Peter A. Shocket,et al.  Gender-Based Differences in Perceptions of Male and Female City Council Candidates , 1993 .

[25]  Susan J. Carroll.  Politics of Difference: Women Public Officials as Agents of Change , 1994 .

[26]  Kim Fridkin Kahn.  The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns , 1996 .

[27]  James D. King,et al.  The Effect of Negative Campaign Advertising on Vote Choice: The Mediating Influence of Gender* , 2003 .

[28]  Christopher R. Berry,et al.  The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?: WHY DO CONGRESSWOMEN OUTPERFORM CONGRESSMEN? , 2011 .

[29]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Traits versus Issues , 2013 .

[30]  I. McAllister,et al.  The Electoral Consequences of Gender in Australia , 1983, British Journal of Political Science.

[31]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences , 1992 .

[32]  L. Huddy,et al.  The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office , 1993 .

[33]  L. Sigelman,et al.  The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[34]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Is Negative Advertising Effective for Female Candidates? , 2003 .

[35]  Daniel Wirls.  Reinterpreting the Gender Gap , 1986 .

[36]  K. Bratton.  The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda Setting , 2002 .

[37]  P. Sellers.  Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Kira Sanbonmatsu.  Gender stereotypes and vote choice , 2002 .

[39]  Kim Fridkin Kahn.  Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate , 1993 .

[40]  Paul S. Herrnson,et al.  The Fairer Sex? , 2006 .

[41]  Gary L. Crawley,et al.  Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[42]  Steven E. Finkel,et al.  A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising , 1998 .

[43]  Sue Thomas.  How Women Legislate , 1994 .

[44]  J. Koch.  Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations? , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[45]  D. Brooks,et al.  Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians , 2011 .

[46]  Judith S. Trent,et al.  Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices , 1983 .

[47]  David Bicknell Truman,et al.  The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion , 1951 .

[48]  Christopher R. Berry,et al.  The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen? , 2009 .

[49]  Kathleen Dolan,et al.  The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates , 2010 .

[50]  Emily T. Metzgar,et al.  Social Media and the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election , 2009 .

[51]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults , 2011, New Media Soc..

[52]  T. Lowi.  Toward Functionalism in Political Science: The Case of Innovation in Party Systems , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[53]  John R. Petrocik.  Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study , 1996 .

[54]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[55]  Maria Braden.  Women Politicians and the Media , 1996 .

[56]  Gerald N. Rosenberg.  The hollow hope : can courts bring about social change? , 1992 .

[57]  P. Herrnson,et al.  Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives , 1997 .

[58]  S. Larson.  “Running as Women”? , 2001 .

[59]  Kathleen Dolan.  Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites , 2005 .

[60]  John R. Petrocik,et al.  The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap , 1999 .

[61]  Cherie D. Maestas,et al.  The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress , 2006 .

[62]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[63]  Kathleen Hall Jamieson,et al.  Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership , 1995 .

[64]  Dianne G. Bystrom,et al.  Gender and Candidate Communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, NewStyle , 2004 .

[65]  G. Gullett.  Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California , 2000 .

[66]  Gail M. Teitzel,et al.  The power of movement. , 2015, Trends in microbiology.

[67]  Julie A. Dolan.  Support for women's interests in the 103rd congress: The distinct impact of congressional women , 1998 .

[68]  The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change , 2000 .

[69]  Sue Thomas.  The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[70]  R. Y. Shapiro,et al.  Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s , 1986 .

[71]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Introduction: The Facebook Election , 2010 .