An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process

This article proposes a modified cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for estimating the human error probability in the maritime accident process on the basis of an evidential reasoning approach. This modified CREAM is developed to precisely quantify the linguistic variables of the common performance conditions and to overcome the problem of ignoring the uncertainty caused by incomplete information in the existing CREAM models. Moreover, this article views maritime accident development from the sequential perspective, where a scenario- and barrier-based framework is proposed to describe the maritime accident process. This evidential reasoning-based CREAM approach together with the proposed accident development framework are applied to human reliability analysis of a ship capsizing accident. It will facilitate subjective human reliability analysis in different engineering systems where uncertainty exists in practice.

[1]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Zaili Yang,et al.  A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment , 2014 .

[3]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Classification of human errors in grounding and collision accidents using the TRACEr taxonomy , 2016 .

[4]  Z. Yang,et al.  Maritime safety analysis in retrospect , 2013 .

[5]  Ernestos Tzannatos,et al.  Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre- and post-ISM period , 2009 .

[6]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning Approach-RIMER , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[7]  Zaili Yang,et al.  A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFS) Analysis Method for Marine Casualties Using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA) , 2013 .

[8]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Safety level of damaged RoPax ships: risk modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis , 2009 .

[9]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Causal factors in accidents of high-speed craft and conventional ocean-going vessels , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[11]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  A safety barrier-based accident model for offshore drilling blowouts , 2013 .

[12]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  A modified CREAM to human reliability quantification in marine engineering , 2013 .

[14]  C. Chauvin Human Factors and Maritime Safety , 2011, Journal of Navigation.

[15]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Influence of impact scenario models on collision risk analysis , 2012 .

[16]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Intelligent Ocean Navigation and Fuzzy-Bayesian Decision/Action Formulation , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[17]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels , 2006, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[18]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Human Fatigue’s Effect on the Risk of Maritime Groundings - A Bayesian Network Modeling Approach , 2014 .

[19]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[21]  Hongwei Xie,et al.  Estimating Human Error Probability using a modified CREAM , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Yi Luo,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Human-Reliability Based on Fuzzy-Clonal Selection , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[23]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Human reliability analysis by fuzzy "CREAM". , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Wei-Min Shen,et al.  A novel human error probability assessment using fuzzy modeling. , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Metin Celik,et al.  Application of CREAM human reliability model to cargo loading process of LPG tankers , 2015 .

[26]  Tayfur Altiok,et al.  Risk Analysis of the Vessel Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Metin Celik,et al.  Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Development and evaluation of a computer-aided system for analyzing human error in railway operations , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Bjørn-Morten Batalden,et al.  Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents , 2014 .

[30]  Metin Celik,et al.  Utilisation of Cognitive Map in Modelling Human Error in Marine Accident Analysis and Prevention , 2014 .

[31]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis Using Evidence Theory and AHP , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Yao Wang,et al.  A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  Jin Wang,et al.  Fuzzy Rule-Based Bayesian Reasoning Approach for Prioritization of Failures in FMEA , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[34]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Faisal Khan,et al.  SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study , 2011 .

[37]  S Bonsall,et al.  Use of Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning in Maritime Security Assessment , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  Jean-Marc Rousset,et al.  The Transient and Progressive Flooding Stages of Damaged Ro-Ro Vessels: A Systematic Review of Entailed Factors , 2011 .

[39]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Modeling the risk of ship grounding—a literature review from a risk management perspective , 2014 .

[40]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Human reliability assessment during offshore emergency conditions , 2013 .

[41]  Tim Bedford,et al.  Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of Human Reliability Analysis , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[42]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Techniques for human reliability evaluation , 2010 .

[43]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Fuzzy logic based decision making system for collision avoidance of ocean navigation under critical collision conditions , 2011 .

[44]  Marzena Kryszkiewicz,et al.  Rough Set Approach to Incomplete Information Systems , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[45]  Christine Chauvin,et al.  Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[46]  Selim Aksoy,et al.  A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems , 2015 .

[47]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance , 2006 .

[49]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[50]  Ulf Paulsson,et al.  A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[51]  Metin Celik,et al.  A methodological extension to human reliability analysis for cargo tank cleaning operation on board chemical tanker ships , 2015 .