Timing of Renal‐Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis

BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury is the most frequent complication in patients with septic shock and is an independent risk factor for death. Although renal‐replacement therapy is the standard of care for severe acute kidney injury, the ideal time for initiation remains controversial. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with early‐stage septic shock who had severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage of the risk, injury, failure, loss, and end‐stage kidney disease (RIFLE) classification system but without life‐threatening complications related to acute kidney injury to receive renal‐replacement therapy either within 12 hours after documentation of failure‐stage acute kidney injury (early strategy) or after a delay of 48 hours if renal recovery had not occurred (delayed strategy). The failure stage of the RIFLE classification system is characterized by a serum creatinine level 3 times the baseline level (or ≥4 mg per deciliter with a rapid increase of ≥0.5 mg per deciliter), urine output less than 0.3 ml per kilogram of body weight per hour for 24 hours or longer, or anuria for at least 12 hours. The primary outcome was death at 90 days. RESULTS The trial was stopped early for futility after the second planned interim analysis. A total of 488 patients underwent randomization; there were no significant between‐group differences in the characteristics at baseline. Among the 477 patients for whom follow‐up data at 90 days were available, 58% of the patients in the early‐strategy group (138 of 239 patients) and 54% in the delayed‐strategy group (128 of 238 patients) had died (P=0.38). In the delayed‐strategy group, 38% (93 patients) did not receive renal‐replacement therapy. Criteria for emergency renal‐replacement therapy were met in 17% of the patients in the delayed‐strategy group (41 patients). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with septic shock who had severe acute kidney injury, there was no significant difference in overall mortality at 90 days between patients who were assigned to an early strategy for the initiation of renal‐replacement therapy and those who were assigned to a delayed strategy. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; IDEAL‐ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682590.)

[1]  F. Tubach,et al.  Timing of Renal Support and Outcome of Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Post Hoc Analysis of the AKIKI Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  Matthew J. Maiden,et al.  Acute kidney injury in sepsis , 2017, Intensive Care Medicine.

[3]  J. Kellum,et al.  Effect of Early vs Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: The ELAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[4]  F. Tubach,et al.  Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  V. Cantaluppi,et al.  Detrimental cross-talk between sepsis and acute kidney injury: new pathogenic mechanisms, early biomarkers and targeted therapies , 2016, Critical Care.

[6]  A. Garg,et al.  Comparison of standard and accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. , 2015, Kidney international.

[7]  Rinaldo Bellomo,et al.  Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study , 2015, Intensive Care Medicine.

[8]  Raymond Vanholder,et al.  International Society of Nephrology's 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): a human rights case for nephrology , 2015, The Lancet.

[9]  S. Bagshaw,et al.  The timing of renal replacement therapy initiation in acute kidney injury: is earlier truly better?*. , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[10]  J. Quenot,et al.  The epidemiology of septic shock in French intensive care units: the prospective multicenter cohort EPISS study , 2013, Critical Care.

[11]  K. Polderman,et al.  An Official ATS/ERS/ESICM/SCCM/SRLF Statement: Prevention and Management of Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Patient: an international consensus conference in intensive care medicine. , 2010, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on organ failure during the early phase of severe sepsis: A randomized controlled trial* , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[14]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation , 2008, Critical care.

[16]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Early isovolaemic haemofiltration in oliguric patients with septic shock , 2006, Intensive Care Medicine.

[17]  J. Vincent,et al.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[18]  P. Armitage,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. , 1976, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. , 2005, JAMA.