Robust multi-scale orientation estimation: Spatial domain Vs Fourier domain

Orientation estimation is considered as an important and vital step towards many pattern recognition and image enhancement tasks. In a noisy environment, the gradient-based estimations provide poor results. A pre-smoothing Gaussian function with an appropriate scale is conventionally used to get better gradients. Later on, fixed-scale approach was extended to include multi-scale gradient estimates. More specifically, multi-scale orientation estimation, based on scale-space axioms, in spatial domain can be formulated. To further boost the performance of multi-scale orientation estimates, a Fourier domain foundation in the form of Directional Filter bank (DFB)is incorporated with multi scale spatial domain approach. This paper presents an approach for estimation of local orientations using multi-scale approach both in spatial and fourier domain. In fourier-domain approach, two linear combinations are deployed, one across the directional image, and the other across scales. This is opposed to only one linear combination across the scales, used in normal spatial domain technique. Simulations are conducted over noisy test images as well as real data. Our objective results indicate that multi-scale fourier domain approach always yields better estimates at variable level of noise as compared to stand alone multi-scale spatial domain. The improvements made by fourier domain estimate can largely be attributed to the use of double linear combination both across directional bands and across scales.

[1]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  Vessel enhancement filter using directional filter bank , 2009, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[2]  Sabih H. Gerez,et al.  Systematic Methods for the Computation of the Directional Fields and Singular Points of Fingerprints , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Fingerprint enhancement by shape adaptation of scale-space operators with automatic scale selection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Tony Lindeberg Edge Detection and Ridge Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Wei-Yun Yau,et al.  A review on fingerprint orientation estimation , 2011, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[6]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Edge Detection and Ridge Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Matti Lassas,et al.  Curvelet-based method for orientation estimation of particles , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[8]  Jiankun Hu,et al.  Enhanced gradient-based algorithm for the estimation of fingerprint orientation fields , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  P. Milanfar,et al.  Multiscale principal components analysis for image local orientation estimation , 2002, Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002..

[10]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Orientation diffusions , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space for Discrete Signals , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Analyzing Oriented Patterns , 1985, IJCAI.

[14]  Tian-Shyr Dai,et al.  A Reliable Fingerprint Orientation Estimation Algorithm , 2011, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[15]  Toshiharu Enomae,et al.  Nondestructive determination of fiber orientation distribution of paper surface by image analysis , 2006 .