Listening as a Missing Dimension in Engineering Education: Implications for Sustainable Community Development Efforts

Although listening is valued in engineering education literature, it is conspicuously absent from engineering curricula. Using interview data, data from published literature, reflective instructional experiences, and the intersection of those three data sources, this study investigates two primary issues: (1) engineering students' sources of resistance to listening instruction in a sustainable community development initiative, and (2) benefits from such instruction. Findings feature a proposed theory of contextual listening and suggest that sources of resistance include the paucity of listening instruction in the engineering curriculum and curricular components that may devalue listening. Benefits of a listening intervention are described, and implications are discussed.

[1]  V. Shiva.  Close to home : women reconnect ecology, health and development worldwide , 1994 .

[2]  Lawrence F. Salmen.  Listen to the People: Participant-Observer Evaluation of Development Projects , 1987 .

[3]  William C. Oakes,et al.  Service-Learning: Engineering in Your Community , 2006 .

[4]  Jeffrey T. Jackson.  The Globalizers: Development Workers in Action , 2007 .

[5]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently , 2006 .

[6]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  Where is ‘Community’?: Engineering education and sustainable community development , 2008 .

[7]  N. Cross,et al.  Listening for a change: Oral testimony and development , 1993 .

[8]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[9]  Krista L. Ratcliffe,et al.  Rhetorical Listening: A Trope for Interpretive Invention and a “Code of Cross-Cultural Conduct” , 1999, College Composition & Communication.

[10]  A. Astin,et al.  Leadership Reconsidered: Engaging Higher Education in Social Change , 2000 .

[11]  Steven Levitt.  Communication literacy for 21 st century engineering education , 2001 .

[12]  The social construction of the listener: Listening behavior across situations, perceived listener status, and cultures , 2003 .

[13]  W. Easterly,et al.  The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good , 2006 .

[14]  S. Burkey.  People First: A Guide to Self-Reliant, Participatory Rural Development , 1992 .

[15]  null null,et al.  Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century , 2008 .

[16]  E. Guba.  Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries , 1981 .

[17]  D. Worthington.  Exploring the Relationship Between Listening Style and Need for Cognition , 2008 .

[18]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design , 1995 .

[19]  J. Mackie,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science , 1965 .

[20]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[21]  L.R. Lattuca,et al.  Panel Session - Engineering Change: Findings from a Study of the Impact of EC2000 , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[22]  Gary L. Downey.  Reproducing Cultural Identity in Negotiating Nuclear Power: The Union of Concerned Scientists and Emergency Core Cooling , 1988 .

[23]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  When Students Resist: Ethnography Of A Senior Design Experience , 2002 .

[24]  D. Beard.  A Broader Understanding of the Ethics of Listening: Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Media Studies and the Ethical Listening Subject , 2009 .

[25]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[26]  William Easterly,et al.  The white man's burden: why the west's efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little god , 2006 .

[27]  K. Roulston,et al.  Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse , 2007 .

[28]  Dorothy A. Winsor,et al.  Writing Like an Engineer: A Rhetorical Education , 1996 .

[29]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Qualitative Methods Used in the Assessment of Engineering Education , 2004 .

[30]  Geoffrey E. Mills.  Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher , 1999 .

[31]  Lawrence F. Salmen,et al.  Bridging Diversity: Participatory Learning for Responsive Development , 2006 .

[32]  Gary Lee Downey,et al.  Risk in Culture: The American Conflict Over Nuclear Power , 1986 .

[33]  Jeffrey C. Bridger,et al.  Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development , 1999 .

[34]  J.A. Leydens,et al.  The Problem of Knowledge in Incorporating Humanitarian Ethics in Engineering Education: Barriers and Opportunities , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[35]  J.A. Leydens,et al.  Engineering to help , 2009, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[36]  Steven Reyer,et al.  Evaluating Communication Skills In An Engineering Curriculum: A Case Study , 2004 .

[37]  Gary L Downey.  STRUCTURE AND PRACTICE IN THE CULTURAL IDENTITIES OF SCIENTISTS: NEGOTIATING NUCLEAR WASTES IN NEW MEXICO , 1988 .

[38]  Michael Hanyak,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Progressively Developing Students' Team and Problem Solving Skills Across the Curriculum , 2002 .

[39]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[40]  F. Reid,et al.  Essay: The Role of Participatory Listening in Collaborative Discourse: Insights from Studies of Engineering Design Teams , 2005 .