Multi-attribute reverse auctions and negotiations with verifiable and not-verifiable offers

Comparative studies of auction and negotiation exchange mechanisms have typically compared the outcomes obtained from the two mechanisms. Their result are inconclusive. The question which this paper aims to address is the viability of outcome-based comparisons. Such comparisons assume that both mechanisms produce the same types of outcomes but their values differ. An argument can be made that this is not necessarily the case. Based on several experiments of multi-attribute auctions and two formats of multi-bilateral negotiations the paper argues that the two mechanisms produce some outcomes which are comparable and other outcomes which are qualitatively different. A surprising finding of our experiments is that the outcomes of the non-verifiable negotiations were more similar to the outcomes of the reverse auctions than to the verifiable negotiations, despite the fact that the latter employ rules taken from the auction mechanism.

[1]  D. Moore,et al.  The Death and Rebirth of the Social Psychology of Negotiation , 2007 .

[2]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans,et al.  A Comparison of Buyer-Determined and Price-Based Multiattribute Mechanisms , 2007 .

[4]  L. Thompson Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[5]  Nir Vulkan,et al.  Markets versus Negotiations: The Predominance of Centralized Markets , 2010 .

[6]  Stefan Strecker,et al.  Information revelation in multiattribute English auctions: A laboratory study , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Bart J. Wilson,et al.  Verifiable Offers and the Relationship between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations , 2005 .

[8]  J. Brandts,et al.  Information, bilateral negotiations, and worker recruitment , 2010 .

[9]  Linda D. Molm Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange* , 2003 .

[10]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Are All E-Commerce Negotiations Auctions? , 2000, COOP.

[11]  Michael Ströbel,et al.  On Auctions as the Negotiation Paradigm of Electronic Markets , 2000, Electron. Mark..

[12]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Towards a Structured Design of Electronic Negotiations , 2003 .

[13]  Jeremy I. Bulow,et al.  Auctions versus Negotiations , 1996 .

[14]  Lisa Hisae Nishii,et al.  Negotiating Rationally: The Dynamics of the Relational-Self in Negotiations , 2017 .

[15]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[16]  Thomas F. Gattiker,et al.  Negotiation, Email, and Internet Reverse Auctions: How Sourcing Mechanisms Deployed by Buyers Affect Suppliers’ Trust , 2007 .

[17]  Bart J. Wilson,et al.  A Comparison of Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations , 2002 .

[18]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  On Negotiations and Deal Making in Electronic Markets , 1999, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[19]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Excitement Up! Price Down! Measuring Emotions in Dutch Auctions , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[20]  Linda D. Molm The Structure of Reciprocity , 2010 .

[21]  Jens Hultman,et al.  Towards a typology of transparency for marketing management research , 2007 .

[22]  Daniel R. Vincent,et al.  Optimal Procurement Mechanisms , 1995 .

[23]  William P. Bottom,et al.  Building a Pathway to Cooperation: Negotiation and Social Exchange between Principal and Agent , 2006 .

[24]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  A Multiattribute Auction Procedure and Its Implementation , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Stefan Strecker,et al.  Electronic Negotiation Systems : The Invite Prototype , 2005 .

[26]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Models for Iterative Multiattribute Procurement Auctions , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Auctions vs. Bargaining: An Empirical Analysis of Medical Device Procurement , 2000 .

[28]  Yeon-Koo Che Design competition through multidimensional auctions , 1993 .

[29]  ECONOMETRICS OF SEALED-BID AUCTIONS , 1999 .