The Role of MRI Pancreatic Protocol in Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Background Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (BRPC) remains a unique entity that is difficult to categorize due to variance in definitions and the small number of patients. The ultimate goal is to achieve a free resection (R0) after a favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy that is somewhat difficult to assess by current radiological parameters. Aim To evaluate the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) pancreatic protocol, including Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI), in patients with BRPC receiving neoadjuvant therapy, and further compare it to RECIST criteria and outcome. Methods Histologically confirmed BRPC patients were prospectively included. DWI-MRI was performed pre- and post-therapy. Clinical characteristics with ensuing operability were recorded and correlated to radiological RECIST/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change, preoperative therapy administrated, surgical resection status, and survival. Results Out of 30 BRPC cases, only 11 (36.7%) ultimately underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Attaining a stationary or stable disease via ADC/RECIST was achieved in the majority of cases (60%/53.3% respectively). Of the 12 patients (40%) who achieved a regression by ADC, 11 underwent surgery with an R0 status. These surgical cases showed variable RECIST responses (PR=5, SD=4, PD=3). Responders by ADC to neoadjuvant therapy were significantly associated to presenting with abdominal pain (p =0.07), a decline in post-therapy CA19-9 (p<0.001), going through surgery (p<0.001), and even achieving better survival (p<0.001 vs. 0.66). Conclusion DWI-MRI ADC picked up patients most likely to undergo a successful operative procedure better than traditional RECIST criteria. An algorithm incorporating novel radiological advances with CA19-9 deserves further assessment in future studies.

[1]  Keiichi Hatamaru,et al.  Clinical dilemma of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration for resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer , 2022 .

[2]  L. Landoni,et al.  Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. , 2020, Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.].

[3]  Kareem Sallam,et al.  The Role of Radiological Parameters in Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer , 2020 .

[4]  S. Murata,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI predicts the histologic response for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a prospective study (DIFFERENT trial) , 2020, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[5]  A. Scarpa,et al.  Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine‐needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine‐needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions , 2018, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[6]  M. Makary,et al.  Outcome of Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in the Contemporary Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2018, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[7]  Li Liu,et al.  Effect of region of interest size on ADC measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma , 2017, Cancer Imaging.

[8]  Yu-Ting Chang,et al.   PET/MRI in pancreatic and periampullary cancer: correlating diffusion-weighted imaging, MR spectroscopy and glucose metabolic activity with clinical stage and prognosis , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Matthew Blackledge,et al.  Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Oncology: Imaging at 3 T. , 2016, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[10]  B. Erickson,et al.  Correlation of ADC With Pathological Treatment Response for Radiation Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer , 2015, Translational oncology.

[11]  T. Conroy,et al.  Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  D. Gouma,et al.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). , 2014, Surgery.

[13]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Response of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not reflected by radiographic indicators , 2012, Cancer.

[14]  V. Paradis,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the regional characterization of liver tumors. , 2012, Radiology.

[15]  Gang Li,et al.  Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of phase II trials. , 2011, Surgery.

[16]  Yi Wang,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinomas: Association with histopathology and tumor grade , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Tibor Schuster,et al.  Preoperative/Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Response and Resection Percentages , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[18]  A. Krasinskas,et al.  Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Sequences do not Improve Pathologic Response Prediction after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer , 2020 .

[19]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Predictors of Resectability and Survival in Patients With Borderline and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  "Radiological and Surgical Implications of Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer." , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[21]  M. Zins,et al.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: MRI conspicuity and pathologic correlations , 2014, Abdominal Imaging.

[22]  Elliot K Fishman,et al.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. , 2014, Radiology.

[23]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.