Rapid Mapping of Small-Scale River-Floodplain Environments Using UAV SfM Supports Classical Theory

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms have rapidly developed as tools for remote mapping at very high spatial resolutions. They have recently gained in popularity in many application fields owing to the versatility of platforms and sensors, ease of deployment, and a steady increase in computational power. Obtaining highly detailed topography data over very small scales is one of the more typical application domains. Here, we demonstrate this application using Structure from Motion (SfM) processing over a small river floodplain in Howard County (Maryland, USA). Evaluation of the derived bare-earth terrain model with state-of-the art LiDAR shows a trivial bias of 1.6 cm and a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 39 cm. We then applied this terrain model to extract floodplain and river cross-section geometries of a small stream, important during high-magnitude urban flash flood events, with the aim to assess its value for floodplain inundation mapping and first order characterization of in-channel hydraulics. Initial findings agree with traditional stream and floodplain classification theory and thus show very promising results for this type of UAV usage. We expect this type of application to gain more momentum in the near future with the ever-growing importance of more detailed data in order to increase resilience to flood risk, especially in urban areas.

[1]  Dimitri Lague,et al.  3D Terrestrial LiDAR data classification of complex natural scenes using a multi-scale dimensionality criterion: applications in geomorphology , 2011, ArXiv.

[2]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera , 2012, Sensors.

[3]  Mozhdeh Shahbazi,et al.  Uav-Based Point Cloud Generation for Open-Pit Mine Modelling , 2015 .

[4]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  Stream hydrological and ecological responses to climate change assessed with an artificial neural network , 1996 .

[5]  Maarten Bakker,et al.  Archival photogrammetric analysis of river–floodplain systems using Structure from Motion (SfM) methods , 2017 .

[6]  A. Porporato,et al.  Role of microtopography in rainfall‐runoff partitioning: An analysis using idealized geometry , 2010 .

[7]  G. C. H. E. de Croon,et al.  Paparazzi: how to make a swarm of Parrot AR Drones fly autonomously based on GPS. , 2013 .

[8]  Richard B. Moore,et al.  The Road to NHDPlus — Advancements in Digital Stream Networks and Associated Catchments , 2016 .

[9]  D. Rosgen A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[10]  F. Dottori,et al.  Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt: Accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling , 2013 .

[11]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[12]  Paolo Russo,et al.  Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry , 2014 .

[13]  Richard E. Brazier,et al.  Water resource management at catchment scales using lightweight UAVs: current capabilities and future perspectives , 2016 .

[14]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[15]  P. Bates Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got? , 2012 .

[16]  Görres Grenzdörffer,et al.  THE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC POTENTIAL OF LOW-COST UAVs IN FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURE , 2008 .

[17]  S. Mudd Investigation of the hydrodynamics of flash floods in ephemeral channels: Scaling analysis and simulation using a shock-capturing flow model incorporating the effects of transmission losses , 2006 .

[18]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[19]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[20]  M. Kalacska,et al.  Structure from motion will revolutionize analyses of tidal wetland landscapes , 2017 .

[21]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling , 2004 .

[23]  M. Craymer The evolution of NAD83 in Canada , 2019 .

[24]  D. Mason,et al.  Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling , 2001 .

[25]  Guy J.-P. Schumann,et al.  High-Accuracy Elevation Data at Large Scales from Airborne Single-Pass SAR Interferometry , 2016, Front. Earth Sci..

[26]  I. Woodhouse,et al.  Structure from Motion (SfM) Photogrammetry with Drone Data: A Low Cost Method for Monitoring Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Forests in Developing Countries , 2017 .

[27]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Floodplain friction parameterization in two‐dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry , 2003 .