Optimal sensor placement for multi-setup modal analysis of structures

Abstract Modal tests on large structures are often performed in multiple setups for practical reasons. Several sensors are kept fixed as reference sensors over all setups, while the other, so called roving sensors, are moved from one setup to another. This paper develops an optimal sensor placement strategy for multi-setup modal identification, which simultaneously optimizes the locations of the reference sensors and roving sensors. As an optimality criterion, the Information Entropy is adopted, which is a scalar measure of uncertainty in the Bayesian framework. The focus in the application goes to repetitive structures where modes typically occur in clusters, with closely spaced natural frequencies and similar wavelengths. The proposed strategy is illustrated for selecting optimal positions of uni-axial sensors for a repetitive frame structure. The influence of the number of reference sensors and two strategies for positioning roving sensors, i.e. a cluster and a uniform distribution of roving sensors, are investigated. The number of reference sensors is found to be preferably equal to or larger than the number of modes to be identified. In this case, the information content, as quantified by the Information Entropy, is not very sensitive to the roving sensor strategy. If less reference sensors are used, it is highly preferred to distribute the roving sensors uniformly over the structure instead of clustering them. The proposed strategy has been validated by an experimental modal test on a floor of an office building of KU Leuven, which has a nearly repetitive structural layout. The results show how optimally locating sensors allows extracting more information from the data. Though the focus is on applications involving repetitive structures, the proposed strategy can be applied to multi-setup modal identification of any large structure.

[1]  Seamus D. Garvey,et al.  Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testing , 1994 .

[2]  Makola M. Abdullah,et al.  Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms , 2001 .

[3]  S. LynchChristopher,et al.  リラクサ強誘電体8/65/35PLZTとオルセンサイクルを用いる焦電廃熱エネルギー回収 | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2012 .

[4]  L. Brillouin Wave propagation in periodic structures : electric filters and crystal lattices , 1953 .

[5]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems , 2004 .

[6]  F. Udwadia Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems , 1994 .

[7]  G. Goodwin,et al.  Optimum experimental design for identification of distributed parameter systems , 1980 .

[8]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis , 2006 .

[9]  L. Hermans,et al.  Modal parameter estimation from inconsistent data sets , 2000 .

[10]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics , 2012 .

[11]  William A. Sethares,et al.  Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification via a genetic algorithm , 1993 .

[12]  D. Kammer Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[13]  D. J. Mead A general theory of harmonic wave propagation in linear periodic systems with multiple coupling , 1973 .

[14]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Efficient Bayesian sensor placement algorithm for structural identification: a general approach for multi‐type sensory systems , 2015 .

[15]  D. J. Mead Wave propagation and natural modes in periodic systems: II. Multi-coupled systems, with and without damping , 1975 .

[16]  Geert Degrande,et al.  A non-parametric probabilistic model for ground-borne vibrations in buildings , 2006 .

[17]  Firdaus E. Udwadia,et al.  A Methodology for Optimal Sensor Locations for Identification of Dynamic Systems , 1978 .

[18]  J. Beck,et al.  Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model Updating , 2000 .

[19]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .

[20]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[21]  M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Sensor placement methodologies for dynamic testing , 1998 .

[22]  D. M. Mead,et al.  WAVE PROPAGATION IN CONTINUOUS PERIODIC STRUCTURES: RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM SOUTHAMPTON, 1964–1995 , 1996 .

[23]  Dongsheng Li,et al.  The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement , 2007 .

[24]  D. J. Mead The forced vibration of one-dimensional multi-coupled periodic structures: An application to finite element analysis , 2009 .

[25]  G. Sen Gupta,et al.  Natural flexural waves and the normal modes of periodically-supported beams and plates , 1970 .

[26]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[27]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Merging Strategies for Multi-Setup Operational Modal Analysis: Application to the Luiz I steel Arch Bridge , 2009 .

[28]  Ting-Hua Yi,et al.  Sensor placement on Canton Tower for health monitoring using asynchronous-climb monkey algorithm , 2012 .