Seismic behavior of two exterior beam–column connections made of normal-strength concrete developed for precast construction

Abstract The lack of in-depth understanding of the seismic behavior and ductility of precast concrete structures makes it difficult to reach to ductility demand which could be exhibited during an earthquake. The limitations are mainly related to the beam-to-column connections as the main load transfer paths. Two distinct exterior beam–column connections made of normal-strength concrete are investigated experimentally. Both dry and wet type installment techniques are used in the industrial type joints while the residential type joints are wet connections. The specimens are subjected cyclic displacement reversals in order to obtain information on strength, stiffness and ductility characteristics of the connection details. The preliminary design of the joints has been updated during the tests based on the damages observed, thus a set of improved specimens have also been built and tested, and a relatively better performance is obtained expectedly. The industrial and residential types of connections showed stable load–displacement cycles with high energy dissipation up to structural drift of 2%, though a significant level of pinching and deterioration of the critical section have occurred at around 3% drift level. The tested specimens have been numerically modeled to calibrate the analytical tools, and a satisfactory approximation has been obtained between experimental and numerical results.

[1]  Tuğrul Tankut,et al.  Performance of a precast concrete beam-to-beam connection subject to reversed cyclic loading , 2005 .

[2]  John F. Stanton,et al.  An Overview of the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Test Building , 1999 .

[3]  Robert E. Englekirk,et al.  Ductile connectors for a precast concrete frame , 1994 .

[4]  M. Seçkin,et al.  BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTIONS IN PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION , 1990 .

[5]  Y. Bozorgnia,et al.  Methods of Analysis for Earthquake-Resistant Structures , 2004 .

[6]  M. Kaya,et al.  Analytical modeling of post-tensioned precast beam-to-column connections , 2009 .

[7]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  The PRESSS program : Current status and proposed plans for phase III , 1996 .

[8]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Pseudodynamic Tests on a Full-Scale 3-Storey Precast Concrete Building: Global Response , 2013 .

[9]  Reza Ramezani,et al.  A new ductile moment-resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: An experimental investigation , 2014 .

[10]  Turan Özturan,et al.  Ductile Connections in Precast Concrete Moment Resisting Frames , 2006 .

[11]  Ercan Yüksel,et al.  Quasi-static cyclic displacement pattern for seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete columns , 2011 .

[12]  Ugur Ersoy,et al.  Precast Concrete Members With Welded Plate Connections Under Reversed Cyclic Loading , 1993 .

[13]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Numerical Issues in Distributed Inelasticity Modeling of RC Frame Elements for Seismic Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Robert Park,et al.  A perspective on the seismic design opf precast concrete structures in New Zealand , 1995 .

[15]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAMES WITH PARTIALLY DEBONDED TENDONS , 1993 .

[16]  Michael Hafner,et al.  Connections Between Precast Elements—Failure Within Connection Region , 1989 .

[17]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  Localization Issues in Force-Based Frame Elements , 2001 .

[18]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: behavior of the mechanical connections and floor diaphragms , 2013 .

[19]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .