Wayfinding and path integration deficits detected using a virtual reality mobile app in patients with traumatic brain injury

The ability to navigate is supported by a wide network of brain areas which are particularly vulnerable to disruption brain injury, including traumatic brain injury (TBI). Wayfinding and the ability to orient back to the direction you have recently come (path integration) may likely be impacted in daily life but have so far not been tested with patients with TBI. Here, we assessed spatial navigation in thirty–eight participants, fifteen of whom had a history of TBI, and twenty–three control participants. Self-estimated spatial navigation ability was assessed using the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction (SBSOD) scale. No significant difference between TBI patients and a control group was identified. Rather, results indicated that both participant groups demonstrated ‘good’ self–inferred spatial navigational ability on the SBSOD scale. Objective navigation ability was tested via the virtual mobile app test Sea Hero Quest (SHQ), which has been shown to predict real–world navigation difficulties and assesses (a) wayfinding across several environments and (b) path integration. Compared to a sub-sample of 13 control participants, a matched subsample of 10 TBI patients demonstrated generally poorer performance on all wayfinding environments tested. Further analysis revealed that TBI participants consistently spent a shorter duration viewing a map prior to navigating to goals. Patients showed mixed performance on the path integration task, with poor performance evident when proximal cues were absent. Our results provide preliminary evidence that TBI impacts both wayfinding and, to some extent, path integration. The findings suggest long–lasting clinical difficulties experienced in TBI patients affect both wayfinding and to some degree path integration ability.

[1]  H. Spiers,et al.  Explaining World-Wide Variation in Navigation Ability from Millions of People: Citizen Science Project Sea Hero Quest , 2021, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  J. Visser-Meily,et al.  Navigation ability in patients with acquired brain injury: A population-wide online study , 2021, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[3]  Thomas J. Dunn,et al.  Revisiting the Santa Barbara sense of direction scale, mental rotations, and gender differences in spatial orientation , 2020, PsyPag Quarterly.

[4]  H. Seers,et al.  OUTCOME , 1977, How to Win Your Case.

[5]  P. Allain,et al.  Assessment and Rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury Using Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review and Discussion Concerning Human-Computer Interactions , 2019, Virtual Reality for Psychological and Neurocognitive Interventions.

[6]  M. H. Claessen,et al.  The Wayfinding Questionnaire: A clinically useful self-report instrument to identify navigation complaints in stroke patients , 2019, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[7]  G. Ling,et al.  Management of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury , 2019, Transfusion.

[8]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  The potential of virtual reality for spatial navigation research across the adult lifespan , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  Antoine Coutrot,et al.  Virtual navigation tested on a mobile app is predictive of real-world wayfinding navigation performance , 2018, bioRxiv.

[10]  Steven M. Weisberg,et al.  Cognitive Maps: Some People Make Them, Some People Struggle , 2018, Current directions in psychological science.

[11]  H. Spiers,et al.  Global Determinants of Navigation Ability , 2017, Current Biology.

[12]  Clare Davies,et al.  Sense of Direction: One or Two Dimensions? , 2017, COSIT.

[13]  B. Miller,et al.  Egocentric and allocentric visuospatial working memory in premotor Huntington's disease: A double dissociation with caudate and hippocampal volumes , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Guillaume A Rousselet,et al.  A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience , 2017, bioRxiv.

[15]  É. Sorita,et al.  The contribution of virtual reality to the diagnosis of spatial navigation disorders and to the study of the role of navigational aids: A systematic literature review. , 2017, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[16]  P. Azouvi,et al.  Spatial cognition. , 2017, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Which way and how far? Tracking of translation and rotation information for human path integration , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Michiel H G Claessen,et al.  A Direct Comparison of Real-World and Virtual Navigation Performance in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2016, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[19]  L. Gray The importance of post hoc approaches for overcoming non-response and attrition bias in population-sampled studies , 2015, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[20]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Self-awareness and traumatic brain injury outcome , 2015, Brain injury.

[21]  J. Hodges,et al.  Lost in spatial translation – A novel tool to objectively assess spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia , 2015, Cortex.

[22]  Maarten Löffler,et al.  Ecological validity of virtual environments to assess human navigation ability , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[23]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Relationship between spatial ability, visuospatial working memory and self-assessed spatial orientation ability: a study in older adults , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[24]  C. V. van Heugten,et al.  Awareness of memory functioning in patients with stroke who have a good functional outcome , 2014, Brain injury.

[25]  Tina Iachini,et al.  The lost ability to find the way: topographical disorientation after a left brain lesion. , 2014, Neuropsychology.

[26]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  What working memory subcomponents are needed in the acquisition of survey knowledge? Evidences from direction estimation and shortcut tasks , 2014, CogSci.

[27]  Tim Wright,et al.  An investigation of the validity of the virtual spatial navigation assessment , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[28]  É. Sorita,et al.  Do patients with traumatic brain injury learn a route in the same way in real and virtual environments? , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  I. White,et al.  Use of record-linkage to handle non-response and improve alcohol consumption estimates in health survey data: a study protocol , 2013, BMJ Open.

[30]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  The transfer from survey (map-like) to route representations into Virtual Reality Mazes: effect of age and cerebral lesion , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of navigation in two neurological patients , 2010, Neuroreport.

[32]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  What determines our navigational abilities? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  D. Pennell,et al.  Functional abnormalities in normally appearing athletes following mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach , 2009, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[35]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[36]  Charles J Duffy,et al.  Detecting navigational deficits in cognitive aging and Alzheimer disease using virtual reality , 2008, Neurology.

[37]  Ronald W. Skelton,et al.  Virtual environment navigation tasks and the assessment of cognitive deficits in individuals with brain injury , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  Suzanne Corkin,et al.  Posterior parahippocampal place learning in H.M. , 2007, Hippocampus.

[39]  L. Nerad,et al.  Human spatial navigation deficits after traumatic brain injury shown in the arena maze, a virtual Morris water maze , 2006, Brain injury.

[40]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. , 2002 .

[41]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Multisensory integration in spatial orientation , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.