Sensorimotor Reorganizations of Arm Kinematics and Postural Strategy for Functional Whole-Body Reaching Movements in Microgravity

Understanding the impact of weightlessness on human behavior during the forthcoming long-term space missions is of critical importance, especially when considering the efficiency of goal-directed movements in these unusual environments. Several studies provided a large set of evidence that gravity is taken into account during the planning stage of arm reaching movements to optimally anticipate its consequence upon the moving limbs. However, less is known about sensorimotor changes required to face weightless environments when individuals have to perform fast and accurate goal-directed actions with whole-body displacement. We thus aimed at characterizing kinematic features of whole-body reaching movements in microgravity, involving high spatiotemporal constraints of execution, to question whether and how humans are able to maintain the performance of a functional behavior in the standards of normogravity execution. Seven participants were asked to reach as fast and as accurately as possible visual targets while standing during microgravity episodes in parabolic flight. Small and large targets were presented either close or far from the participants (requiring, in the latter case, additional whole-body displacement). Results reported that participants successfully performed the reaching task with general temporal features of movement (e.g., movement speed) close to land observations. However, our analyses also demonstrated substantial kinematic changes related to the temporal structure of focal movement and the postural strategy to successfully perform -constrained- whole-body reaching movements in microgravity. These immediate reorganizations are likely achieved by rapidly taking into account the absence of gravity in motor preparation and execution (presumably from cues about body limbs unweighting). Specifically, when compared to normogravity, the arm deceleration phase substantially increased. Furthermore, greater whole-body forward displacements due to smaller trunk flexions occurred when reaching far targets in microgravity. Remarkably, these changes of focal kinematics and postural strategy appear close to those previously reported when participants performed the same task underwater with neutral buoyancy applied to body limbs. Overall, these novel findings reveal that humans are able to maintain the performance of functional goal-directed whole-body actions in weightlessness by successfully managing spatiotemporal constraints of execution in this unusual environment.

[1]  N. Teasdale,et al.  Effect of terminal accuracy requirements on temporal gaze-hand coordination during fast discrete and reciprocal pointings , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Min-Ho Song,et al.  How Fast Is Your Body Motion? Determining a Sufficient Frame Rate for an Optical Motion Tracking System Using Passive Markers , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Direction-dependent arm kinematics reveal optimal integration of gravity cues , 2016, eLife.

[5]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Energy-related optimal control accounts for gravitational load: comparing shoulder, elbow, and wrist rotations. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Jerome Carriot,et al.  Learning to expect the unexpected: rapid updating in primate cerebellum during voluntary self-motion , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Massion,et al.  Is the center of gravity controlled during upper trunk movements? , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  J. Massion,et al.  Forward and backward axial synergies in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Thierry Pozzo,et al.  Human whole-body reaching in normal gravity and microgravity reveals a strong temporal coordination between postural and focal task components , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  D G Watt,et al.  Pointing at memorized targets during prolonged microgravity. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  C. Bourdin,et al.  Visual feedback of the moving arm allows complete adaptation of pointing movements to centrifugal and Coriolis forces in human subjects , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  Joseph McIntyre,et al.  Multimodal reference frame for the planning of vertical arms movements , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Francesco Nori,et al.  Evidence for Composite Cost Functions in Arm Movement Planning: An Inverse Optimal Control Approach , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  C. Papaxanthis,et al.  The Temporal Structure of Vertical Arm Movements , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Olivier White,et al.  Initial information prior to movement onset influences kinematics of upward arm pointing movements. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Charalambos Papaxanthis,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation of point-to-point arm movements after spaceflight: the role of internal representation of gravity force in trajectory planning. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Reaching while standing in microgravity: a new postural solution to oversimplify movement control , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Alexander Frolov,et al.  Why and how are posture and movement coordinated? , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[21]  J. Vercher,et al.  Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Massion,et al.  Is the erect posture in microgravity based on the control of trunk orientation or center of mass position? , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  I Kozlovskaya,et al.  Pointing arm movements in short- and long-term spaceflights. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[24]  Charalambos Papaxanthis,et al.  Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Inverse dynamic investigation of voluntary leg lateral movements in weightlessness: a new microgravity-specific strategy. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Vincent Nougier,et al.  Perceived body orientation in microgravity: effects of prior experience and pressure under the feet. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[27]  C. Papaxanthis,et al.  Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field , 2007, Neuroscience.

[28]  I. Kozlovskaya,et al.  Slowing of human arm movements during weightlessness: the role of vision , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[29]  Christophe Bourdin,et al.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Ramona Ritzmann,et al.  No Neuromuscular Side-Effects of Scopolamine in Sensorimotor Control and Force-Generating Capacity Among Parabolic Fliers , 2016 .

[31]  F. Horak Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? , 2006, Age and ageing.

[32]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Olivier White,et al.  Active Collisions in Altered Gravity Reveal Eye-Hand Coordination Strategies , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Whole-Body Movements in Long-Term Weightlessness: Hierarchies of the Controlled Variables Are Gravity-Dependent , 2017, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  J. Vercher,et al.  Vision of the hand prior to movement onset allows full motor adaptation to a multi-force environment , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[37]  A. Gollhofer,et al.  Regulation of bipedal stance: dependency on “load” receptors , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  F Crevecoeur,et al.  Movement stability under uncertain internal models of dynamics. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[40]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Adaptive modifications of postural attitude in conditions of weightlessness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  J. Foley The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[42]  P. M. Hilt,et al.  Evidence for subjective values guiding posture and movement coordination in a free-endpoint whole-body reaching task , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[43]  H. Ross Motor skills under varied gravitoinertial force in parabolic flight. , 1991, Acta astronautica.

[44]  J. Lackner,et al.  Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  J Blouin,et al.  Effect of gravity-like torque on goal-directed arm movements in microgravity. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  J Massion,et al.  Kinematic synergy adaptation to microgravity during forward trunk movement. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  J. McIntyre,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity , 2005, Neuroscience.

[48]  Olivier White,et al.  Coherent Multimodal Sensory Information Allows Switching between Gravitoinertial Contexts , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[49]  M Lipshits,et al.  Axial synergies under microgravity conditions. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[50]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Absence of center of mass control for leg abduction in long-term weightlessness in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  Digby Elliott,et al.  A ménage À trois: the eye, the hand and on-line processing , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[52]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[53]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[54]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  J. Massion Movement, posture and equilibrium: Interaction and coordination , 1992, Progress in Neurobiology.

[56]  Frédéric Danion,et al.  Intentional On-line Adaptation of Rhythmic Movements during a Hyper- to Microgravity Change , 1997 .

[57]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[58]  A Pedotti,et al.  Is the regulation of the center of mass maintained during leg movement under microgravity conditions? , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[60]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  A Functional Taxonomy of Bottom-Up Sensory Feedback Processing for Motor Actions , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  K. E. Popov,et al.  Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  C. Bourdin,et al.  Kinematic features of whole-body reaching movements underwater: Neutral buoyancy effects , 2016, Neuroscience.

[63]  H. M. Karara,et al.  Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[64]  I. Howard,et al.  Accuracy of aimed arm movements in changed gravity. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.