Prognostic value of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease. The prognostic factor currently used is not accurate enough to predict the outcomes of patients with DLBCL. The prognostic significance of interim PET/CT in DLBCL remains controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the predictive value of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT after first-line treatment in patients with DLBCL. METHODS Thirty-two patients with DLBCL underwent baseline, interim and post-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. Imaging results were analyzed for the survival of patients via software SPSS 13.0, retrospectively. RESULTS Thirty-one of the 32 patients were treated with R-CHOP regimen, and interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT of 24 patients was performed after 2 cycles of treatment. After a median follow-up period of 16.7 months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were significantly different between the groups above and below SUV(max) cut-off value of 2.5 (P=0.039). No significant differences were found in the 2-year PFS rates if SUV(max) cut-off values were set as 2.0 and 3.0, respectively (P=0.360; P=0.113). CONCLUSIONS Interim PET/CT could predict the prognosis of DLBCL patients with the SUV(max) cut-off value of 2.5, but more clinical data should be concluded to confirm this conclusion. KEY WORDS Fludeoxyglucose F18; lymphoma; large cell; diffuse; prognosis; standard utility value.

[1]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: 6-year results of an open-label randomised study of the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  B. Coiffier,et al.  SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Blood.

[3]  Sang-We Kim,et al.  Limited role of interim PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP , 2011, Annals of Hematology.

[4]  J. Min,et al.  Prognostic significance of interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT after three or four cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Andrew Homb,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for Early Response Assessment in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Poor Predictive Value of International Harmonization Project Interpretation , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  S. Ferrero,et al.  The Outcome of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Treated with Rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) Is Not Predicted by 18-FDG-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography (PET) Performed at Intermediate In-Course Evaluation, but Only by PET Assessed at the End of Therapy. , 2010 .

[7]  B. Coiffier,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. , 2010, Blood.

[8]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  Risk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in Advanced-stage diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography report interpretation as predictor of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma including analysis of ‘indeterminate’ reports , 2010, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[10]  R. Advani,et al.  Interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study. , 2010, Blood.

[11]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  D. Focosi,et al.  False positive PET scanning caused by inactivated influenza virus vaccination during complete remission from anaplastic T-cell lymphoma , 2008, Annals of Hematology.

[13]  Markus Loeffler,et al.  Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  H. Iwasaki,et al.  False‐positive FDG–PET findings due to bone metastasis from prostate cancer in staging of non‐Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2007, European journal of haematology.

[15]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. Morgan,et al.  False-Positive Restaging PET Scans Involving the Spleen in Two Patients With Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2006, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[17]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling , 2000, Nature.

[18]  I. Lossos,et al.  High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Clinical Trials and Observations , 2005 .

[20]  L. Staudt,et al.  Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. , 2004, Blood.