Enacting social media success in local public administrations

Purpose The diffusion of social media among public administrations has significantly grown in the last years. This phenomenon has created a field of research that seeks to understand the adoption and impact of social media in the public sector. The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors that make social media successful in Spanish local governments. Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on an adapted version of a neo-institutional model: Enacting Electronic Government Success (EEGS). The data have been collected through three main sources: primary data from a questionnaire designed and conducted by the authors, secondary data of statistical sources, and tertiary data collected through Klout Score. Findings The results from a survey and statistical analysis provide preliminary validation of the model and show a direct relationship between organizational, institutional, and environmental factors with the successful use of social media in local public administrations. The data analysis shows that ten variables jointly explain 54.6 percent (adjusted R2=0.546) of the variability observed in the dependent variable. Research limitations/implications First, the analysis model used represents a limited sample size to carry out a complex quantitative analysis. Second, the use of Klout Scores can offer some bias. Finally, certain variables complicate the comparative potential of the study. Originality/value This study provides original primary data and contributes to the growing field of study related to social technologies in public administrations. This research also confirms in an exploratory way the validity of the EEGS model.

[1]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[2]  J. Criado,et al.  Estrategias y realidades en la difusión de las redes sociales en las administraciones públicas. Análisis desde una perspectiva institucionalista , 2015 .

[3]  Arthur Mickoleit,et al.  Social Media Use by Governments: A Policy Primer to Discuss Trends, Identify Policy Opportunities and Guide Decision Makers , 2014 .

[4]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Government and Social Media: A Case Study of 31 Informational World Cities , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Nick Ellison,et al.  Social Media and Local Government: Citizenship, Consumption and Democracy , 2014 .

[6]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government innovation through social media , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Social media in Egyptian government websites: Presence, usage, and effectiveness , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Jörg Becker,et al.  What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  How much Klout do you have ... A test of system generated cues on source credibility , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Deborah Agostino,et al.  Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities , 2013 .

[15]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Key factors and processes for digital government success , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[16]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social Media in the Public Sector: A Guide to Participation, Collaboration and Transparency in The Networked World , 2012 .

[17]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Ines Mergel,et al.  The social media innovation challenge in the public sector , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[21]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[22]  Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen,et al.  A good man but a bad wizard. About the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[23]  Miriam Lips,et al.  E-Government is dead: Long live Public Administration 2.0 , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[24]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Citizens’ attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0 , 2012 .

[25]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  J. Grimes,et al.  Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[27]  M. Hillebrandt,et al.  Open government: connecting vision and voice , 2012 .

[28]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Enacting Electronic Government Success , 2012, Integrated Series in Information Systems.

[29]  Isabel Anger,et al.  Measuring influence on Twitter , 2011, i-KNOW '11.

[30]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  David Lazer,et al.  More Voices Than Ever? Quantifying Media Bias in Networks , 2011, ICWSM.

[32]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Klemens Böhm,et al.  Impact assessment in public policy: Towards a Web 2.0 application , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[34]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[35]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk,et al.  The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  Mila Gascó El papel de las instituciones en el desarrollo del gobierno electrónico en América Latina: algunas reflexiones , 2009, Estado, Gobierno y Gestión Pública.

[38]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[40]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Managing information systems , 1989 .

[41]  Jane G. Bensahel Making the Right Decision , 1982, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[42]  Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán,et al.  Social Media in Local Governments in Mexico: A Diffusion Innovation Trend and Lessons , 2016 .

[43]  M. Z. Sobaci Social Media and Local Governments , 2016 .

[44]  J. I. Grande,et al.  Las Redes sociales digitales en la gestión y las políticas públicas: avances y desafíos para un gobierno abierto , 2013 .

[45]  J. Ignacio Criado,et al.  Social Media and Public Administration in Spain: A Comparative Analysis of the Regional Level of Government , 2013 .

[46]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Political Public Relations : Old Practice, New Theory-Building , 2013 .

[47]  Peter Bellström,et al.  Facebook usage in government - a case study of information content , 2012, AMCIS.

[48]  Steven Sams,et al.  AN OVERVIEW STUDY OF TWITTER IN THE UK LOCAL GOVERNMENT , 2012 .

[49]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  J. Ignacio Criado,et al.  Social Media for Political Campaigning. The Use of Twitter by Spanish Mayors in 2011 Local Elections , 2012 .

[51]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Martin De Saulles Social media and local government in England: who is doing what? , 2011, ECEG 2011.

[53]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[54]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Hacia un modelo de los determinantes de éxito de los portales de gobierno estatal en México , 2009 .

[55]  David Osimo Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? , 2008 .

[56]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[57]  K. Weick Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[58]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .