The components of text that influence reading times and recall in skilled and less skilled college readers

The present study examined the components of text that predict reading times and recall in skilled and less skilled college readers. Skilled and less skilled college students read two narrative and two expository passages from a computer terminal at their own rate. The results demonstrated that skilled readers read faster and recalled more than did less skilled readers. The variance in reading times was largely accounted for by word‐decoding and lexical‐access factors. Reading‐ability differences in reading time were best accounted for by word‐decoding factors and the number of new concepts active in working memory. The variability in recall scores was primarily accounted for by importance level of the idea units in the text. The results indicate that sensitivity to the structure of text was not a source of reading‐ability differences in reading times and recall for either narrative or expository texts. The results suggest that reading‐ability differences in prose processing result from word‐decoding fact...

[1]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Word Knowledge and Working Memory as Predictors of Reading Skill. , 1988 .

[2]  M Lansman,et al.  Individual differences in long-term memory access , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Coding and Comprehension in Skilled Reading and Implications for Reading Instruction. , 1977 .

[4]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Structural components of reading time , 1980 .

[5]  M. Masson,et al.  Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text. , 1983 .

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Processing determinants of reading speed. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Advanced Outlines, Familiarity, and Text Genre on Retention of Prose. , 1980 .

[8]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions , 1985 .

[9]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse Comprehension and Sources of Individual Differences. , 1977 .

[10]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[11]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[12]  Mark D. Jackson,et al.  Further evidence for a relationship between memory access and reading ability , 1980 .

[13]  K. Stanovich.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY , 1980 .

[14]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[15]  M. Mason,et al.  From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[16]  James I. Brown.  The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[17]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Discourse Type on Recall , 1984 .

[18]  Don C. Mitchell,et al.  The Scheduling of Text Integration Processes in Reading , 1981 .

[19]  M Mason,et al.  Reading ability and the encoding of item and location information. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R. Chabot.  The Speed of Word Recognition Subprocesses and Reading Achievement in College Students. , 1984 .

[21]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[22]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Serial Position and Rated Importance in the Recall of Text. Technical Report No. 219. , 1981 .

[23]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Text structure and reading time for sentences , 1980 .