Using Audio and Audio-Visual Feedback to Enhance Learners’ Perception and Production of Tag Questions

Intonation is fundamental to human speech in conveying meaning. Teachers and researchers have raised the concern that the intonation of a second language is difficult both to teach and to learn in the language classroom. However, due to particular characteristics of technology-based instruction, there is an increasing tendency to teach and learn second language intonation through the use of technology and software. For the above reasons, an open-access tool which incorporates computer-based audio-visual feedback was designed and piloted to help Chinese learners of English improve their perception and production of rising and falling tag questions. Six international students (native speakers of Mandarin) participated in the study. The participants were pre- and post tested on their perception (in context and in isolation) and production (in context) of question tags. The participants also underwent training lasting approximately two weeks. Each week, the participants were asked to complete two blocks of the training materials, for about 15-20 minutes each time. Individual semi-structured interviews took place after the training with all participants. Based on observations, pre- and post-test scores, and the interviews conducted, the results revealed that the participants have become more aware of their perception of tag questions. Also, the participants showed some improvement in their production of tag questions. Participants also stated that the two applications used: WASP, a software that allows the recording, display and analysis of speech and Online Audio Recording, a plug-in for the e-learning platform Moodle were beneficial, interesting to use and helpful for their learning.

[1]  A study of yes/no questions in English and Chinese: With special reference to Chinese EFL learners’ understanding of their forms and functions , 2011 .

[2]  Ron I. Thomson Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training: Targeting Second Language Vowel Perception Improves Pronunciation. , 2011 .

[3]  Alysse Weinberg,et al.  Préférences des apprenants face à l’utilisation de la technologie dans l’apprentissage des langues , 2005 .

[4]  Christina Gitsaki,et al.  Teaching WELL and loving IT , 2004 .

[5]  Dorothy M. Chun Discourse Intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice , 2002 .

[6]  Murray J. Munro,et al.  Computer-Based Training for Learning English Vowel Contrasts. , 2004 .

[7]  Wuhan Zhu Polite Requestive Strategies in Emails: An Investigation of Pragmatic Competence of Chinese EFL Learners , 2012 .

[8]  Debra M. Hardison Contextualized Computer-based L2 Prosody Training: Evaluating the Effects of Discourse Context and Video Input , 2013 .

[9]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course , 1983 .

[10]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? , 2008, Language Teaching.

[11]  R. Schmidt The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[12]  Michael Levy,et al.  Computer applications in second language acquisition : Foundations for teaching , testing and research , 2009 .

[13]  Steven L. Thorne,et al.  Second language development theories and technology-mediated language learning , 2011 .

[14]  Lucy Pickering The Role of Tone Choice in Improving ITA Communication in the Classroom. , 2001 .

[15]  Uschi Felix,et al.  The web’s potential for language learning: the student’s perspective , 2001, ReCALL.

[16]  K. Watson-Gegeo,et al.  Ethnography in ESL: Defining the Essentials , 1988 .

[17]  Islam Al-Momani,et al.  LANGUAGE IN INDIA , 2008 .

[18]  Dorothy M. Chun SIGNAL ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR TEACHING DISCOURSE INTONATION , 1998 .

[19]  V. Melissa Holland,et al.  Preliminary Tests of Language Learning in a Speech-Interactive Graphics Microworld. , 1999 .

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English , 2010 .

[21]  Debra M. Hardison,et al.  Generalization of Computer Assisted Prosody Training: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings , 2004 .

[22]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Carla Meskill,et al.  USING THE WORLD WIDE WEB TO INTEGRATE SPANISH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE: A PILOT STUDY , 1998 .

[24]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse , 1989 .

[25]  Ann Wennerstrom,et al.  Intonational Meaning in English Discourse: A Study of Non-Native Speakers. , 1994 .

[26]  Masumeh Taie,et al.  Skill Acquisition Theory and Its Important Concepts in SLA , 2014 .

[27]  Dj Dik Hermes,et al.  Visual Display for the Teaching of Intonation , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[28]  Deborah F. Burleson Intonation Patterns in English Tag Questions of Japanese Speakers of English as a Second Language , 2007 .

[29]  K. Bot Visual feedback of intonation I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. , 1983 .

[30]  Jesús Romero Trillo,et al.  The pragmatic function of intonation in L2 discourse: English tag questions used by Spanish speakers , 2005 .

[31]  Richard G. Kern Perspectives on Technology in Learning and Teaching Languages , 2006 .

[32]  Micah William Park,et al.  Teaching Intonation Patterns through Reading Aloud , 2011 .

[33]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  12. Technologies for prosody in context: Past and future of L2 research and practice , 2008 .

[34]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Recent Developments in Technology and Language Learning: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis , 2013 .