Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) has become a well-established noninvasive imaging method for the assessment of severe carotid stenosis (70–99% by NASCET criteria). However, CE-MRA is not a standardised technique, but encompasses different concurrent techniques. This review analyses possible differences. A bivariate random effects meta-analysis of 17 primary diagnostic accuracy studies confirmed a high pooled sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 93.0% for carotid CE-MRA in severe carotid stenosis. Sensitivity was fairly uniform among the studies, while specificity showed significant variation (I2 = 73%). Metaregressions found significant differences for specificity with two covariates: specificity was higher when using not only maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, but also three-dimensional (3D) images (P = 0.01). Specificity was also higher with electronic images than with hardcopies (P = 0.02). The timing technique (bolus-timed, fluoroscopically triggered or time-resolved) did not result in any significant differences in diagnostic accuracy. Some nonsignificant trends were found for the percentages of severe carotid disease, acquisition time and voxel size. In conclusion, in CE-MRA of severe carotid stenosis the three major timing techniques yield comparably high diagnostic accuracy, electronic images are more specific than hardcopies, and 3D images should be used in addition to MIP images to increase the specificity.

[1]  J Paul Finn,et al.  High Spatial-Resolution CE-MRA of the Carotid Circulation With Parallel Imaging: Comparison of Image Quality Between 2 Different Acceleration Factors at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[2]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy? , 2003, European Radiology.

[3]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making , 2003, Stroke.

[4]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .

[5]  Crest Administrative.  Guidelines for Screening of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; Cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Intervent , 2008 .

[6]  C Marsault,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Haitao Chu,et al.  Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Guidelines for Screening of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; Cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology , 2007, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[10]  G. Schroth,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Juan Alvarez-Linera,et al.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[13]  Gary A. Ford,et al.  Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. , 2008, Cerebrovascular diseases.

[14]  S J Riederer,et al.  Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[15]  M. Weston.  Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[16]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[17]  K. Kreitner,et al.  Kontrastverstärkte dreidimensionale MR-Angiographie der A. carotis bei 1,0 Tesla im Vergleich zuri.a. DSA - ist die Methode für die Diagnostik von Karotisstenosen geeignet? , 2001 .

[18]  J Menke,et al.  Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[19]  D. Purdie.  Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn , 2003 .

[20]  S. Wulff.  SAS for Mixed Models , 2007 .

[21]  J C Froment,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Markus Horn,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  G. Scotti,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. , 2005, Radiology.

[24]  D. Bilecen,et al.  MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents , 2007, European Radiology.

[25]  Javier Zamora,et al.  Meta-DiSc : a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data , 2015 .

[26]  Horst Urbach,et al.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: A feasibility study , 2007, European Radiology.

[27]  W. Bautz,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: Accuracy compared with intraarterial x‐ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  W. John Boscardin,et al.  SAS® for mixed models (2nd edn). Ramon C. Littell, George A. Milliken, Walter W. Stroup, Russell D. Wolfinger and Oliver Schabenberger, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 2006. No. of pages: xii + 814. Price: $89.95. ISBN 10: 1-59047-500-3; ISBN 13: 978-1-59047-500-3 , 2007 .

[29]  [Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable?]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[30]  Whitney B Pope,et al.  Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view. , 2007, Radiology.

[31]  Irene Katzan,et al.  Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the , 2006, Stroke.

[32]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Highlights of the guidelines for screening of extracranial carotid artery disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[33]  Russell P. Harris,et al.  Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  M. Essig,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck vessels. , 2007, European radiology.

[36]  H. Diener,et al.  Risk Factors, Outcome, and Treatment in Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke: The German Stroke Data Bank , 2001, Stroke.

[37]  S. Goldstein.  Cardiac Remodeling: Mechanism and Treatment , 2006 .

[38]  W. Nitz,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-Observer Variability Compared With Selective Catheter Angiography , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[39]  B. Tom,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease , 2004, Neurology.

[40]  S. Feuerbach,et al.  High‐resolution contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[41]  A. Baird,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2008, Stroke.

[42]  Franz A Fellner,et al.  High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Elliptical Centric k-Space Ordering of Supra-aortic Arteries Compared With Selective X-Ray Angiography , 2002, Stroke.

[43]  J. Slattery,et al.  Equivalence of Measurements of Carotid Stenosis: A Comparison of Three Methods on 1001 Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[44]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  G. Laub,et al.  Technical requirements, biophysical considerations and protocol optimization with magnetic resonance angiography using blood-pool agents. , 2007, European radiology.

[46]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[47]  O. Elgersma,et al.  Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[48]  J. Sterne,et al.  Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[49]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[50]  B. Yawn,et al.  Screening for carotid artery stenosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.