An Overview of Engineering Approaches to Improving Agricultural Animal Welfare

[1]  W. Boisseau.  Animal Liberation , 2019, Routledge Handbook of Radical Politics.

[2]  N. Widmar,et al.  Economic considerations of breeding for polled dairy cows versus dehorning in the United States. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  C. Phillips,et al.  Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  N. Widmar,et al.  Exploring Relationships between Ethical Consumption, Lifestyle Choices, and Social Responsibility , 2016 .

[5]  T. Sonstegard,et al.  Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  A. Williams,et al.  Implications for Welfare, Productivity and Sustainability of the Variation in Reported Levels of Mortality for Laying Hen Flocks Kept in Different Housing Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Studies , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Pieter Rutsaert,et al.  'Would you eat cultured meat?': Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. , 2015, Meat science.

[8]  L. Laestadius,et al.  Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments , 2015, Public Health Nutrition.

[9]  D. Karcher,et al.  The Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply project: An introduction , 2015, Poultry science.

[10]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat , 2015 .

[11]  G. Tonsor,et al.  The U.S. Gestation Stall Debate , 2015 .

[12]  M. Post.  An alternative animal protein source: cultured beef , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  N. Widmar,et al.  Comparing Consumer Preferences for Livestock Production Process Attributes Across Products, Species, and Modeling Methods , 2014, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[14]  N. Widmar,et al.  Welfare and Market Impacts of Food Safety Measures in China: Results from Urban Consumers' Valuation of Product Attributes , 2014 .

[15]  Dian Zhu,et al.  Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food attributes: The case of pork , 2014 .

[16]  H. H. Kristensen,et al.  The Blind Hens’ Challenge: Does it Undermine the View that Only Welfare Matters in Our Dealings with Animals? , 2014 .

[17]  C. Driessen,et al.  Emerging Profiles for Cultured Meat; Ethics through and as Design , 2013, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[18]  John J. McGlone,et al.  The Future of Pork Production in the World: Towards Sustainable, Welfare-Positive Systems , 2013, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[19]  C. Croney,et al.  Food Animal Production: Ethics and Quality Assurance , 2013 .

[20]  Kyle Powys Whyte,et al.  Ideas for How to Take Wicked Problems Seriously , 2012 .

[21]  J. Bruinsma,et al.  World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision , 2012 .

[22]  K. Stafford,et al.  Addressing the pain associated with disbudding and dehorning in cattle , 2011 .

[23]  P. Thompson,et al.  Integration: valuing stakeholder input in setting priorities for socially sustainable egg production. , 2011, Poultry science.

[24]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Survey among Belgian pig producers about the introduction of group housing systems for gestating sows. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[26]  F M Mitloehner,et al.  Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. , 2010, Poultry science.

[27]  J. Webster.  Husbandry and animal welfare. , 2011 .

[28]  R C Newberry,et al.  Hen welfare in different housing systems. , 2011, Poultry science.

[29]  D. Sumner,et al.  Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context. , 2011, Poultry science.

[30]  G. Berndes,et al.  How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030 , 2010 .

[31]  Terence J. Centner,et al.  Limitations on the Confinement of Food Animals in the United States , 2010 .

[32]  P. Vesilind.  Continental Drift: Agricultural Trade and the Widening Gap Between European Union and United States Animal Welfare Laws , 2010 .

[33]  T. Duffield,et al.  The effect of meloxicam on behavior and pain sensitivity of dairy calves following cautery dehorning with a local anesthetic. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  P. Thompson,et al.  Why using genetics to address welfare may not be a good idea. , 2010, Poultry science.

[35]  G. Tonsor,et al.  Consumer voting and demand behavior regarding swine gestation crates , 2009 .

[36]  Adam Shriver.  Knocking Out Pain in Livestock: Can Technology Succeed Where Morality has Stalled? , 2009 .

[37]  K. Cheng,et al.  Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. , 2009, Poultry science.

[38]  P. Thompson.  The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken Problem , 2008 .

[39]  I. Veissier,et al.  European approaches to ensure good animal welfare , 2008 .

[40]  W. Kuenzel.  Neurobiological basis of sensory perception: welfare implications of beak trimming. , 2007, Poultry science.

[41]  S. Ferrie,et al.  The Ethics of What We Eat , 2007 .

[42]  W. Bessei,et al.  The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens , 2007 .

[43]  H. Cheng,et al.  Morphopathological changes and pain in beak trimmed laying hens , 2006 .

[44]  Efthimia Tsakiridou,et al.  The role of food quality certification on consumers' food choices , 2006 .

[45]  L. Keeling.  Healthy and Happy: Animal Welfare as an Integral Part of Sustainable Agriculture , 2005, Ambio.

[46]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Public health implications of meat production and consumption , 2005, Public Health Nutrition.

[47]  H. Gonyou.  Experiences with alternative methods of sow housing. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[48]  K. Baltzer,et al.  Consumers’ willingness to pay for food quality – The case of eggs , 2004 .

[49]  S. A. Rahman.  Animal welfare: a developing country perspective. , 2004 .

[50]  A. Bayvel.  The OIE animal welfare strategic initiative - progress, priorities and prognosis. , 2004 .

[51]  M. C. Morris,et al.  Science, Pigs, and Politics: A New Zealand Perspective on the Phase-Out of Sow Stalls , 2004 .

[52]  P. Hester,et al.  Beak trimming egg-laying strains of chickens , 2003 .

[53]  Mark W. Rosegrant,et al.  Book Review: Fish to 2020: Supply and Demand in Changing Global Markets , 2003 .

[54]  A. Heber,et al.  NUISANCE POTENTIAL AND PIG PERFORMANCE OF A CONVENTIONAL AND A HIGH RISE™ SWINE FARROWING BARNS , 2003 .

[55]  J. Faure,et al.  Indirect selection for improvement of animal well-being. , 2003 .

[56]  W. Muir,et al.  Incorporation of competitive effects in breeding programs to improve productivity and animal well being. , 2002 .

[57]  G. Harper,et al.  Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare , 2002 .

[58]  I. Duncan.  The pros and cons of cages , 2001 .

[59]  H. Keener,et al.  AMMONIA EMISSIONS AND HYDROGEN SULFIDE LEVELS DURING HANDLING OF MANURE-LADEN DRYING BED MATERIAL IN A HIGH-RISE™ HOG FACILITY , 2001 .

[60]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Consumer Attitude to Beef Quality Labeling and Associations with Beef Quality Labels , 1999 .

[61]  W. Muir,et al.  Improving animal well-being through genetic selection. , 1998, Poultry science.

[62]  K. Stafford,et al.  Acute cortisol responses of calves to four methods of dehorning by amputation. , 1998, Australian veterinary journal.

[63]  P. Thompson.  Ethics and the Genetic Engineering of Food Animals , 1997 .

[64]  W. Muir,et al.  Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. , 1996, Poultry science.

[65]  I. Duncan,et al.  Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings , 1996 .

[66]  M. Gentle,et al.  Beak trimming of poultry: its implications for welfare , 1995 .

[67]  D. Broom,et al.  Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[68]  J. Craig,et al.  Beak trimming effects on behavior patterns, fearfulness, feathering, and mortality among three stocks of White Leghorn pullets in cages or floor pens. , 1991, Poultry science.

[69]  I. Duncan,et al.  Behavioural consequences of partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in poultry. , 1989, British poultry science.

[70]  H. Blokhuis,et al.  Effects of beak trimming and floor type on feed consumption and body weight of pullets during rearing. , 1987, Poultry science.

[71]  J. B. Callicott,et al.  The Case for Animal Rights , 1985 .

[72]  K. Cheng,et al.  Early egg production in genetically blind (rc/rc) chickens in comparison with sighted (Rc+/rc) controls. , 1985, Poultry science.

[73]  B. O. Hughes,et al.  Genetic analysis of strain differences in pre-laying behaviour in battery cages. , 1985, British poultry science.

[74]  D. Wood‐Gush.  Strain differences in response to sub-optimal stimuli in the fowl , 1972 .

[75]  M. Stephens,et al.  Animal Welfare , 1939, Nature.