Processing (un-)predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish

This paper investigates the way the predictability of prosodic patterns in a particular language influences the processing of stress information by native speakers of that language. We extend previous findings where speakers of languages with predictable stress had difficulties to process and represent stress information when confronted with a language with distinctive stress and investigate how the co-existence of a predictable stress pattern and exceptions to that regularity within a single language influences prosodic processing. The stress system of Turkish constitutes an instructive test case since it employs predictable stress on the final syllable of a prosodic word (e.g., mısır “corn”) and some exceptional nonfinal stress (e.g., mısır “Egypt”). Results from an event-related potential (ERP) study on stress violations in Turkish trisyllabic words showed asymmetrical ERP responses for different stress violations: Stress violations with final stress produced an N400 effect whereas violations with nonfinal stress produced a P300 effect. The application of the predictable pattern to words with lexical stress led to lexical costs and the application of exceptional stress to words with default stress to effects reflecting the evaluation of this pattern. Although final stress constitutes no alternative pattern for words with exceptional stress, participants have difficulties to judge this pattern as incorrect. In contrast, exceptional stress patterns are detected easily when applied incorrectly to words that normally receive final stress. These findings demonstrate nicely the co-existence of two phonological processing routines in Turkish speakers. Furthermore, the variability of stress patterns does not affect prosodic processing in general but instead leads to differential effects in stress perception. We conclude that stress predictability does not homogenously result in the so-called “stress deafness” effects in stress processing, but that it rather emerges only for the default stress pattern.

[1]  Mireille Besson,et al.  Musicians and the Metric Structure of Words , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Baris Kabak,et al.  Exceptions to stress and harmony in Turkish: co-phonologies or prespecification? , 2011 .

[3]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[4]  N. Kazanina,et al.  Listeners Use Vowel Harmony and Word-Final Stress to Spot Nonsense Words: A Study of Turkish and French , 2010 .

[5]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in simultaneous French–Spanish bilinguals , 2010, Cognition.

[6]  Ulrike Domahs,et al.  Experimental evidence for optimal and minimal metrical structure of German word prosody , 2009 .

[7]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The processing of German word stress: evidence for the prosodic hierarchy* , 2008, Phonology.

[8]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  R. Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  S. Levi Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish , 2005, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[11]  A. Göksel,et al.  Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar , 2004 .

[12]  Claudia K. Friedrich,et al.  Pitch modulates lexical identification in spoken word recognition: ERP and behavioral evidence. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Ahmet Sözen,et al.  5 A Model of Power-Sharing in Cyprus: From the 1959 London-Zurich Agreements to the Annan Plan , 2004 .

[15]  Burkhard Maess,et al.  Dissociation of human and computer voices in the brain: Evidence for a preattentive gestalt‐like perception , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[16]  C. O. Orgun,et al.  Turkish stress: a review , 2003, Phonology.

[17]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[18]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ , 2002 .

[19]  Irene Vogel,et al.  The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish , 2001, Phonology.

[20]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A robust method to study stress "deafness". , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. Cutler,et al.  Voornaam is not (really) a Homophone: Lexical Prosody and Lexical Access in Dutch , 2001, Language and speech.

[22]  A. Cutler,et al.  Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Mehler,et al.  A destressing deafness in French , 1997 .

[24]  Michael Hammond,et al.  Heavy trochees in Choctaw morphology , 1993, Phonology.

[25]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[27]  M. Charette The vital role of the trochaic foot in explaining Turkish word endings , 2008 .

[28]  Johannes Knaus,et al.  THE PROCESSING OF WORD STRESS: EEG STUDIES ON TASK-RELATED COMPONENTS , 2007 .

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[30]  Heidi Altmann,et al.  The perception and production of second language stress : a cross-linguistic experimental study , 2006 .

[31]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Aligning Linguistic and Brain Views on Language Comprehension , 2003 .

[32]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ , 2002 .

[33]  Sharon Inkelas The prosody-morphology interface: Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: representations versus the grammar , 1999 .

[34]  B. Hayes Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .

[35]  Sharon Inkelas,et al.  Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish : representations vs . the grammar , 1994 .

[36]  K. Zimmer Some Observations on Non-Final Stress in Turkish , 1970 .

[37]  A. Cutler,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Exploring the Role of Lexical Stress in Lexical Recognition , 2022 .