Drug-disease and drug-drug interactions: systematic examination of recommendations in 12 UK national clinical guidelines

Objective To identify the number of drug-disease and drug-drug interactions for exemplar index conditions within National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines. Design Systematic identification, quantification, and classification of potentially serious drug-disease and drug-drug interactions for drugs recommended by NICE clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and depression in relation to 11 other common conditions and drugs recommended by NICE guidelines for those conditions. Setting NICE clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and depression Main outcome measures Potentially serious drug-disease and drug-drug interactions. Results Following recommendations for prescription in 12 national clinical guidelines would result in several potentially serious drug interactions. There were 32 potentially serious drug-disease interactions between drugs recommended in the guideline for type 2 diabetes and the 11 other conditions compared with six for drugs recommended in the guideline for depression and 10 for drugs recommended in the guideline for heart failure. Of these drug-disease interactions, 27 (84%) in the type 2 diabetes guideline and all of those in the two other guidelines were between the recommended drug and chronic kidney disease. More potentially serious drug-drug interactions were identified between drugs recommended by guidelines for each of the three index conditions and drugs recommended by the guidelines for the 11 other conditions: 133 drug-drug interactions for drugs recommended in the type 2 diabetes guideline, 89 for depression, and 111 for heart failure. Few of these drug-disease or drug-drug interactions were highlighted in the guidelines for the three index conditions. Conclusions Drug-disease interactions were relatively uncommon with the exception of interactions when a patient also has chronic kidney disease. Guideline developers could consider a more systematic approach regarding the potential for drug-disease interactions, based on epidemiological knowledge of the comorbidities of people with the disease the guideline is focused on, and should particularly consider whether chronic kidney disease is common in the target population. In contrast, potentially serious drug-drug interactions between recommended drugs for different conditions were common. The extensive number of potentially serious interactions requires innovative interactive approaches to the production and dissemination of guidelines to allow clinicians and patients with multimorbidity to make informed decisions about drug selection.

[1]  A. B. Prasad,et al.  British National Formulary , 1994 .

[2]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Michael Shannon,et al.  The serotonin syndrome. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Wu,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  A. Kiss,et al.  Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. , 2007, JAMA.

[6]  M Alan Brookhart,et al.  Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, JAMA.

[7]  C. Holman,et al.  Comorbidity and repeat admission to hospital for adverse drug reactions in older adults: retrospective cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  David W. Bates,et al.  Review Paper: What Evidence Supports the Use of Computerized Alerts and Prompts to Improve Clinicians' Prescribing Behavior? , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Göran Petersson,et al.  Increasing polypharmacy - an individual-based study of the Swedish population 2005-2008 , 2010, BMC clinical pharmacology.

[10]  Florence T. Bourgeois,et al.  Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11‐year national analysis , 2010, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[11]  Bruce Guthrie,et al.  High risk prescribing in primary care patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events: cross sectional population database analysis in Scottish general practice , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  E. Perrin,et al.  Guiding Principles for the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity: An Approach for Clinicians , 2012, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  S. Wyke,et al.  Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study , 2012, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Calderón-Larrañaga,et al.  Multimorbidity, polypharmacy, referrals, and adverse drug events: are we doing things well? , 2012, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[16]  P. Pronovost Enhancing physicians' use of clinical guidelines. , 2013, JAMA.

[17]  Thomas Agoritsas,et al.  Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. , 2013, Chest.

[18]  James Woodcock,et al.  A Framework for Crafting Clinical Practice Guidelines that are Relevant to the Care and Management of People with Multimorbidity , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity. , 2013, Age and ageing.

[20]  Mph Cynthia M. Boyd MD,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine and the Hard Problem of Multimorbidity , 2013, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[21]  David Rind,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  K. Petrie,et al.  Unhelpful information about adverse drug reactions , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines 15: going from evidence to recommendation - determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength]. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[24]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Potential Therapeutic Competition in Community-Living Older Adults in the U.S.: Use of Medications That May Adversely Affect a Coexisting Condition , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  David M. Kent,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine and the Hard Problem of Multimorbidity , 2014, Journal of general internal medicine.

[26]  Š. Alušík,et al.  Serotonin syndrome. , 2014, Neuro endocrinology letters.

[27]  G. Onder,et al.  Understanding adverse drug reactions in older adults through drug-drug interactions. , 2014, European journal of internal medicine.

[28]  The Veterans Health Administration Patient Aligned Care Teams: Lessons in Primary Care Transformation , 2014, Journal of general internal medicine.

[29]  M. Cowie National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. , 2015, European heart journal.

[30]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Changes in opioid and other analgesic use 1995–2010: Repeated cross‐sectional analysis of dispensed prescribing for a large geographical population in Scotland , 2015, European journal of pain.

[31]  D. Jayne,et al.  SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS , 2014 .