Heathland conservation status mapping through integration of hyperspectral mixture analysis and decision tree classifiers

Monitoring the conservation status of natural habitats is an essential aspect of effective conservation management. Not only data on habitat occurrence are needed, but also detailed information on the structural and functional characteristics of the habitat patches is crucial for an adequate conservation status assessment. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images performs well in discriminating dominant land cover and vegetation classes, but the accuracy drops significantly for the classification of more subtle differences in conservation status that are related to structural characteristics. This study proposes a method to facilitate ecological conservation status assessment based on decision tree modeling of subpixel fraction estimates steered by ecological expert knowledge. In particular, it contributes to the spatially explicit assessment of an important structural aspect of dry heathland vegetation, namely the heather age structure, using Airborne Hyperspectral line-Scanner radiometer (AHS-160) data of the Kalmthoutse Heide in northern Belgium. We implemented a subpixel unmixing approach to identify the percentage of heather, sand and shadow in each heather pixel, and subsequently applied a decision tree classification to allocate each pixel to a certain age class. As such, our method provides a tool that contributes to the information required for an appropriate management and successful conservation of natural heathlands.

[1]  J R Healey,et al.  The repeatability of vegetation classification and mapping. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  S. Ustin,et al.  Building spectral libraries for wetlands land cover classification and hyperspectral remote sensing. , 2009, Journal of Environmental Management.

[3]  Marc Dufrêne,et al.  Changes in the distribution of carabid beetles in Belgium revisited: Have we halted the diversity loss? , 2010 .

[4]  Adrian C. Newton,et al.  Identifying cost-effective indicators to assess the conservation status of forested habitats in Natura 2000 sites , 2008 .

[5]  M. Hermy,et al.  Does the heathland flora in north-western Belgium show an extinction debt? , 2006 .

[6]  J. Borak.  Feature selection and land cover classification of a MODIS-like data set for a semiarid environment , 1999 .

[7]  John H. Maindonald,et al.  Data Analysis and Graphics Using R: An Example-Based Approach , 2010 .

[8]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  Danny A. P. Hooftman,et al.  Mapping to inform conservation: A case study of changes in semi-natural habitats and their connectivity over 70 years , 2012 .

[10]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Application of remote sensing to parks and protected area monitoring: Introduction to the special issue , 2009 .

[11]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Habitat mapping and quality assessment of heathlands using a modified kernel-based reclassification technique , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[12]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  An object-based approach to quantity and quality assessment of heathland habitats in the framework of natura 2000 using hyperspectral airborne ahs images , 2010 .

[13]  R. Lucas,et al.  Rule-based classification of multi-temporal satellite imagery for habitat and agricultural land cover mapping , 2007 .

[14]  D. Peddle.  Spectral Mixture Analysis and Geometric-Optical Reflectance Modeling of Boreal Forest Biophysical Structure , 1999 .

[15]  S. Franklin,et al.  Remote sensing for large-area habitat mapping , 2005 .

[16]  Daniel Schläpfer,et al.  An automatic atmospheric correction algorithm for visible/NIR imagery , 2006 .

[17]  Geert De Blust,et al.  Europe's Living Landscapes , 2007 .

[18]  G. Zalidis,et al.  Using Earth Observation to update a Natura 2000 habitat map for a wetland in Greece. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Lieve Vriens,et al.  De biologische waarderingskaart: biotopen en hun verspreiding in vlaanderen en het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest , 2011 .

[20]  D. Roberts,et al.  A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery , 2002 .

[21]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[22]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[23]  R. Fisher.  THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[24]  S. Delalieux,et al.  An automated waveband selection technique for optimized hyperspectral mixture analysis , 2010 .

[25]  D. Thompson,et al.  Heathland Eutrophication Effects Considered-From Beetles and Biomass to Competition and Conservation@@@Heathlands: Patterns and Processes in a Changing Environment. , 1994 .

[26]  Mike Ashmore,et al.  Modelling the impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on Calluna‐dominated ecosystems in the UK , 2004 .

[27]  José Antonio Gómez,et al.  The INTA AHS system , 2005, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[28]  C. H. Gimingham,et al.  The Description and Interpretation of Cyclical Processes in a Heath Community: I. Vegetational Change in Relation to the Calluna Cycle , 1969 .

[29]  Raymond L. Czaplewski,et al.  Variance Estimates and Confidence Intervals for the Kappa Measure of Classification Accuracy , 1997 .

[30]  N. Webb.  Changes on the Heathlands of Dorset, England, between 1978 and 1987 , 1990 .

[31]  S. Sanjeevi,et al.  A comparison of the classification of wetland characteristics by linear spectral mixture modelling and traditional hard classifiers on multispectral remotely sensed imagery in southern India , 2006 .

[32]  Caspar A. Mücher,et al.  Integrating remote sensing in Natura 2000 habitat monitoring: prospects on the way forward , 2011 .

[33]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[34]  G. Foody.  Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy , 2004 .

[35]  J. M. Rey Benayas,et al.  Remote sensing and the future of landscape ecology , 2009 .

[36]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[37]  Lieve Vriens,et al.  De Biologische Waarderingskaart , 2011 .

[38]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. , 1983 .

[39]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Generic wavelet-based hyperspectral classification applied to vegetation stress detection , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[41]  Alessandro Mecocci,et al.  Theoretical and experimental assessment of noise effects on least-squares spectral unmixing of hyperspectral images , 2005 .

[42]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Remote sensing of structurally complex semi-natural vegetation— an example from heathland , 1987 .

[43]  N. Webb,et al.  The traditional management of European heathlands , 2008 .

[44]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Remote Sensing of Mangrove Wetlands: Relating Canopy Spectra to Site-Specific Data , 1996 .

[45]  E. Weeda,et al.  Nederlandse oecologische flora : wilde planten en hun relaties , 1985 .

[46]  A. Watt,et al.  Bracken versus heather, a study in plant sociology , 1955 .

[47]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Endmember variability in Spectral Mixture Analysis: A review , 2011 .

[48]  Jan Verbesselt,et al.  Magnitude- and Shape-Related Feature Integration in Hyperspectral Mixture Analysis to Monitor Weeds in Citrus Orchards , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[49]  David G. Rossiter,et al.  Technical Note: Statistical methods for accuracy assesment of classified thematic maps , 2004 .

[50]  S. Running,et al.  What does Remote Sensing Do for Ecology , 1991 .

[51]  Toon Spanhove,et al.  Can remote sensing estimate fine-scale quality indicators of natural habitats? , 2012 .

[52]  Birgit Kleinschmit,et al.  Approaches to utilising QuickBird data for the monitoring of NATURA 2000 habitats , 2008 .

[53]  M. Barnsley,et al.  Sub-pixel habitat mapping of a costal dune ecosystem , 2002 .

[54]  M. Bock,et al.  Object-oriented methods for habitat mapping at multiple scales – Case studies from Northern Germany and Wye Downs, UK , 2005 .

[55]  G. B. Groom,et al.  Handbook for Surveillance and Monitoring of European Habitats , 2005 .

[56]  P. C. Smits,et al.  QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS FOR LAND-COVER MAPPING , 1999 .

[57]  Mark Cutler,et al.  Remote sensing of upland vegetation: the potential of high spatial resolution satellite sensors , 2004 .

[58]  P. Fisher.  The pixel: A snare and a delusion , 1997 .

[59]  P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological restoration and creation: a review , 1995 .

[60]  W. Diemont,et al.  Effects of Climate and Management on the Productivity of Dutch Heathlands , 1994 .

[61]  Heidi Demolder,et al.  Ontwikkeling van criteria voor de beoordeling van de lokale staat van instandhouding van de Natura 2000 habitattypen: versie 2.0 , 2009 .