Return on Investment in Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Practices: A Mixed-Methods Study

Background The use of electronic health records (EHR) in clinical settings is considered pivotal to a patient-centered health care delivery system. However, uncertainty in cost recovery from EHR investments remains a significant concern in primary care practices. Objective Guided by the question of “When implemented in primary care practices, what will be the return on investment (ROI) from an EHR implementation?”, the objectives of this study are two-fold: (1) to assess ROI from EHR in primary care practices and (2) to identify principal factors affecting the realization of positive ROI from EHR. We used a break-even point, that is, the time required to achieve cost recovery from an EHR investment, as an ROI indicator of an EHR investment. Methods Given the complexity exhibited by most EHR implementation projects, this study adopted a retrospective mixed-method research approach, particularly a multiphase study design approach. For this study, data were collected from community-based primary care clinics using EHR systems. Results We collected data from 17 primary care clinics using EHR systems. Our data show that the sampled primary care clinics recovered their EHR investments within an average period of 10 months (95% CI 6.2-17.4 months), seeing more patients with an average increase of 27% in the active-patients-to-clinician-FTE (full time equivalent) ratio and an average increase of 10% in the active-patients-to-clinical-support-staff-FTE ratio after an EHR implementation. Our analysis suggests, with a 95% confidence level, that the increase in the number of active patients (P=.006), the increase in the active-patients-to-clinician-FTE ratio (P<.001), and the increase in the clinic net revenue (P<.001) are positively associated with the EHR implementation, likely contributing substantially to an average break-even point of 10 months. Conclusions We found that primary care clinics can realize a positive ROI with EHR. Our analysis of the variances in the time required to achieve cost recovery from EHR investments suggests that a positive ROI does not appear automatically upon implementing an EHR and that a clinic’s ability to leverage EHR for process changes seems to play a role. Policies that provide support to help primary care practices successfully make EHR-enabled changes, such as support of clinic workflow optimization with an EHR system, could facilitate the realization of positive ROI from EHR in primary care practices.

[1]  D. Gans,et al.  Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[2]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[3]  D. Blumenthal.  Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. , 2009, The West Virginia medical journal.

[4]  Francis Lau,et al.  Perceived Impact of Electronic Medical Records in Physician Office Practices: A Review of Survey-Based Research , 2012, Interactive journal of medical research.

[5]  Mindy E. Flanagan,et al.  The next-generation electronic health record: perspectives of key leaders from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  John Doucette,et al.  Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  Correlates of Electronic Health Record Adoption in Office Practices: A Statewide Survey , 2006, AMIA.

[8]  Qingxia Chen,et al.  An Electronic Medical Record in Primary Care: Impact on Satisfaction, Work Efficiency and Clinic Processes , 2006, AMIA.

[9]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[10]  N. Archer,et al.  A Comparison of Physician Pre-Adoption and Adoption Views on Electronic Health Records in Canadian Medical Practices , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  A survey analysis suggests that electronic health records will yield revenue gains for some practices and losses for many. , 2013, Health affairs.

[12]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[13]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Masako Kanai-Pak,et al.  Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  Arild Faxvaag,et al.  Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians , 2004, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  A qualitative study of Canada’s experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology , 2011, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[19]  Thomas E. Norris,et al.  Informatics in Primary Care , 2002, Health Informatics.

[20]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system , 1999, AMIA.

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[22]  M. Stewart,et al.  Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[23]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Best Practices in EMR Implementation: A Systematic Review , 2006, AMIA.

[24]  Mihir A. Parikh,et al.  Paper Versus Electronic Medical Records: The Effects of Access on Physicians' Decisions to Use Complex Information Technologies , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[25]  David C. Ribar,et al.  Analysis of panel data, 2nd edition , 2004 .

[26]  Stephen C Schoenbaum,et al.  Measure, learn, and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement. , 2005, Health affairs.

[27]  Stephen H. Cohen,et al.  A pilot study to document the return on investment for implementing an ambulatory electronic health record at an academic medical center. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[28]  Sarah J Clark,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Pediatric Practices , 2006, Pediatrics.

[29]  Lisa P. Newmark,et al.  Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[30]  G W Keever,et al.  EMR to the rescue. An ambulatory care pilot project shows that data sharing equals cost shaving. , 2001, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[31]  T. Sussman,et al.  A mixed studies literature review of family physicians' participation in research. , 2014, Family medicine.

[32]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[33]  J. Aaronson,et al.  Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective. , 2001, Family medicine.

[34]  Christopher E. West,et al.  The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. , 2005, Health affairs.

[35]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[36]  D. Bates.  Getting in Step: Electronic Health Records and their Role in Care Coordination , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.