Management control systems for R&D activities in government sector: a case of Indonesia

Research and Development (R&D) organisation has different activity, employee’s characteristics, goals, and planning system from a non-R&D organisation. It requires Management Control Systems (MCS) that fit R&D activities. The study proposes four important core elements of MCS particularly for a R&D organisation: desired ends, actors, control implementation, and control tools. The study investigates the existence and the use of those core elements in R&D project from the Government units and the control systems implemented by three government units. The study finds the existence of desired ends to have qualitative characteristics and to use it to control the project direction and to limit the scientific boundary. The actor is found to be treated differently, and therefore the use of decision space to reduce domination of the actor over the controller is found to be implemented. The MCS is found to be implemented in three stages: Input, Process, and Output stage. All of the three government units use a formal control type with different control tools, control dimension, and value of representation.

[1]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Accounting and human behaviour , 1976 .

[2]  Bernard J. Jaworski.  Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[3]  Eric G. Flamholtz.  Accounting, budgeting and control systems in their organizational context: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1983 .

[4]  Parulian Silaen,et al.  Management control systems framework for R&D organisation: a new approach , 2007 .

[5]  Ingemund Hägg,et al.  "Case studies" in accounting research , 1979 .

[6]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Theories and case studies of organisational accounting practices: limitation or liberation? , 1996 .

[7]  S. Lane,et al.  Strategies for research. , 1994, Science.

[8]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process , 2000 .

[9]  D. Otley,et al.  The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation , 2004 .

[10]  Ravi Jain,et al.  Management of Research and Development Organizations: Managing the Unmanageable , 1990 .

[11]  John E. Gibson,et al.  Managing research and development , 1981 .

[12]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  A Conspectus of Management Control Theory: 1900-1972 , 1974 .

[13]  W. Ouchi.  A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[14]  B. Twiss.  Managing Technological Innovation , 1974 .

[15]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Theories and Case Studies: Limitation or Liberation? , 1996 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROLS AND DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM DECISION MAKING: A FIELD STUDY. , 1985 .

[17]  F. Wolf,et al.  Accounting in organized anarchies: Understanding and designing accounting systems in ambiguous situations☆ , 1981 .

[18]  Jacob G. Birnberg,et al.  Culture and control: A field study , 1988 .

[19]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  Budget use, task uncertainty, system goal orientation and subunit performance: A test of the ‘fit’ hypothesis in not-for-profit hospitals , 1991 .

[20]  Petro Georgiou,et al.  The Goal Paradigm and Notes Towards a Counter Paradigm , 1973 .

[21]  Michel Lebas,et al.  MANAGEMENT CONTROL: THE ROLES OF RULES, MARKETS AND CULTURE[1] , 1986 .

[22]  Tony Lowe,et al.  Critical perspectives in management control , 1989 .

[23]  R. Anthony,et al.  Management Control Systems , 2020, Management Control Systems and Tools for Internationalization Success.

[24]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[26]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[27]  Geoffrey Place,et al.  National Policies for Science & Technology: Needed — More Intuitive Applied Research , 1977 .