IDENTIFYING STUDENTS WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE: SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS’ PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS

From its inception as a disability category in the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, serving students under the special education category Emotional Disturbance (ED) has been a challenging task for school psychologists. In particular, the vague and ambiguous federal definition has created an environment in which inconsistent assessment practices and decision making are almost inevitable. In this study, we examined school psychologists’ (N = 214) assessment practices when determining initial eligibility for ED, as well as their perceptions regarding the language contained within the federal ED definition. Findings indicated that although school psychologists recognize the need for a multimethod, multisource assessment model when ED is a classification consideration, in many instances, their actual assessments are missing commonly recommended sources of data for making eligibility decisions, including classroom observations; parent, teacher, and student interviews; and behavior rating scales. The results from the study provide a useful overview of school psychologists’ assessment practices and are couched within the questions and confusion that have surrounded the federal ED definition since its codification into law.

[1]  S. Becker,et al.  Eligibility, Assessment, and Educational Placement Issues for Students Classified with Emotional Disturbance: Federal and State-Level Analyses , 2011 .

[2]  George M. Batsche,et al.  The Status of School Psychology: Demographic Characteristics, Employment Conditions, Professional Practices, and Continuing Professional Development , 2008 .

[3]  Michael H. Epstein,et al.  The Children and Youth We Serve , 2005 .

[4]  E. Clark,et al.  Shifting from Categories to Services: Comprehensive School-Based Mental Health for Children with Emotional Disturbance and Social Maladjustment. , 2004 .

[5]  K. Merrell,et al.  Deconstructing a Definition: Social Maladjustment versus Emotional Disturbance and Moving the EBD Field Forward. , 2004 .

[6]  W. Jenson,et al.  Social maladjustment and students with behavioral and emotional disorders: Revisiting basic assumptions and assessment issues , 2004 .

[7]  S. G. Little,et al.  Evaluating the differential treatment of emotional disturbance and social maladjustment , 2004 .

[8]  John D. Hall,et al.  Contemporary practices in school psychology: A national survey of roles and referral problems , 2002 .

[9]  L. Reddy.  Serious Emotional Disturbance in Children and Adolescents: Current Status and Future Directions , 2001 .

[10]  D. Cullinan,et al.  Comorbidity among Students with Emotional Disturbance , 2001 .

[11]  R. Hough,et al.  Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in youths across five sectors of care. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[12]  K. Kavale,et al.  Emotional or Behavioral Disorders: Background and Current Status of the E/BD Terminology and Definition , 2000 .

[13]  Frank R. Vellutino,et al.  Differentiating Between Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  K. Merrell,et al.  Internalizing symptoms and affect of children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A comparative study with an urban African American sample , 1999 .

[15]  Virginia M. Tong,et al.  WHERE THE BOYS ARE: Do Cross-Gender Misunderstandings of Language Use and Behavior Patterns Contribute to the Overrepresentation of Males in Programs for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders?. , 1998 .

[16]  B. Doll.  Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and youth: An agenda for advocacy by school psychology. , 1996 .

[17]  D. Oswald,et al.  Identification and Placement of Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance. Part I , 1995 .

[18]  R. Skiba,et al.  Opening the Floodgates? The Social Maladjustment Exclusion and State SED Prevalence Rates. , 1994 .

[19]  H. Clarizio.  Social maladjustment and emotional disturbance: Problems and positions II , 1992 .

[20]  S. Forness.  Legalism versus Professionalism in Diagnosing SED in the Public Schools. , 1992 .

[21]  R. Skiba,et al.  Qualifications vs. Logic and Data: Excluding Conduct Disorders from the SED Definition. , 1992 .

[22]  Thomas J. Dishion,et al.  Family, School, and Behavioral Antecedents to Early Adolescent Involvement with Antisocial Peers. , 1991 .

[23]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The DSM-III-R field trial of disruptive behavior disorders. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[24]  H. Clarizio.  Differentiating emotionally impaired from socially maladjusted students , 1987 .

[25]  E. Bower.  Defining emotional disturbance public policy and research , 1982 .