Attitude change.

IN AN EMOTIVE debate at RCN Congress in 1999, general secretary Christine Hancock accepted that the RCN was institutionally racist. There are a number of important characteristics of the approach that the RCN has taken towards cultural diversity and equality since that time. First, it is derived from the views and experiences of RCN members. that there are no quick fixes and that sound foundations require time and resources.

[1]  Denise M. Driscoll,et al.  Uncertainty Orientation and Recall of Person-Descriptive Information , 1991 .

[2]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A model of dual attitudes. , 2000, Psychological review.

[3]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[4]  J. Brehm.  Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Belief accessibility and context effects in attitude measurement , 1989 .

[6]  R. McCrae.  Social consequences of experiential openness. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[8]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[9]  Norman Miller,et al.  Involvement and dogmatism as inhibitors of attitude change , 1965 .

[10]  R. Fazio.  Self-perception theory: A current perspective. , 1987 .

[11]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[12]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  Effects of Atypical Exemplars on Racial Beliefs: Enlightened Racism or Generalized Appraisals , 1995 .

[13]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. , 1995 .

[14]  C. Judd,et al.  Spontaneous prejudice in context: variability in automatically activated attitudes. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. , 1977 .

[16]  D. Bem.  Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[17]  L. Festinger,et al.  Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[18]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Some dynamic properties of attitude structures: Context-induced response facilitation and polarization. , 1991 .

[20]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Persuasion by a Single Route: A View From the Unimodel , 1999 .

[21]  C. Staats,et al.  Attitudes established by classical conditioning. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[22]  I. Blair,et al.  The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice , 2002 .

[23]  Kimberly A. Cameron,et al.  Strategies for Resisting Persuasion , 2003 .

[24]  J. Krosnick.  Attitude importance and attitude change , 1988 .

[25]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[26]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[27]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects , 2000, Psychological science.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  James K. Beggan.  On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. , 1992 .

[30]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Subliminal Conditioning of Attitudes , 1992 .

[31]  A. Greenwald.  6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[32]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[33]  P. Vernon,et al.  The heritability of attitudes: a study of twins. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Dissonance and Self-perception: An integrative View of Each Theory's Proper Domain of Application , 1977 .

[35]  C. Staats,et al.  Meaning established by classical conditioning. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  E. Tanke,et al.  Behavior and attitude: Some people are more consistent than others. , 1976 .

[37]  J. Krosnick.  The Stability of Political Preferences: Comparisons of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Attitudes , 1991 .

[38]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. , 1989 .

[39]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot , 2002 .

[40]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[41]  F. Strack,et al.  Awareness of influence as a precondition for implementing correctional goals. , 1996 .

[42]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.