The Structural Organization of a Language Interview: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.

Abstract This paper examines the widely-held—but largely untested—assumption that a language interview is a “structured conversational exchange”. Specifically, the structural organization of twenty audio- and videotaped oral-skills course-placement interviews were analyzed for features of conversation and interviews by using conversation analysis techniques, in which talk-in-interaction is studied on a turn-by-turn, sequential basis from the perspective of the participants in the interaction. The results indicate that the interview encounters proceed through distinct phases and are composed of sequences that roughly parallel the organization of conversation. However, the responsibility for initiating the sequences and the form the initiations take differ, and thus lend to the characterization of the encounters as interviews, and interviews of a distinctive kind, for the participants. It is suggested that the analytic procedures illustrated in this paper be applied to more widely-used oral testing instruments in order to evaluate their utility in eliciting conversational interaction.

[1]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Proficiency: Understanding the Construct. , 1988 .

[2]  James E. Weaver,et al.  Language tests at school , 1979 .

[3]  C. Goodwin.  Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .

[4]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[5]  Tina Raffaldini,et al.  The Use of Situation Tests as Measures of Communicative Ability , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[6]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  On taking language tests , 1984 .

[7]  Claire J. Kramsch.  From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence , 1986 .

[8]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[9]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  David S. Meyer,et al.  A Research Agenda , 1991 .

[11]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview , 1986 .

[12]  Rüdiger Grotjahn.  Test validation and cognitive psychology: some methodological considerations , 1986 .

[13]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Oral‐Proficiency Testing: A Critical Analysis , 1985 .

[14]  E. Shohamy.  A Proposed Framework for Testing the Oral Language of Second/Foreign Language Learners , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[16]  Gene H. Lerner.  On the syntax of sentences-in-progress , 1991, Language in Society.

[17]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  The Construct Validation of Some Components of Communicative Proficiency , 1982 .

[18]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[19]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  THE CONSTRUCT VALIDATION OF THE FSI ORAL INTERVIEW1 , 1981 .

[20]  Lyle F. Bachman.  Language Testing-SLA Research Interfaces , 1988, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[21]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .