κ0 for soil sites: Observations from KiK-net sites and their use in constraining small-strain damping profiles for site response analysis

Small-strain damping profiles developed from geotechnical laboratory testing have been observed to be smaller than the damping inferred from the observed site amplification from downhole array recordings. This study investigates the high-frequency spectral decay parameter (κ0) of earthquake motions from soil sites and evaluates the use of κ0 to constrain the small-strain damping profile for one-dimensional site response analysis. Using data from 51 sites from the Kiban-Kyoshin strong motion network (KiK-net) array in Japan and six sites from California, a relationship was developed between κ0 at the surface and both the 30-m time-averaged shear wave velocity (Vs30) and the depth to the 2.5 km/s shear wave velocity horizon (Z2.5). This relationship demonstrates that κ0 increases with decreasing Vs30 and increasing Z2.5. An approach is developed that uses this relationship to establish a target κ0 from which to constrain the small-strain damping profile used in one-dimensional site response analysis. This approach to develop κ0-consistent damping profiles for site response analysis is demonstrated through a recent site amplification study of Central and Eastern North America for the NGA-East project.

[1]  Stéphane Drouet,et al.  Analysis of the Origins of κ (Kappa) to Compute Hard Rock to Rock Adjustment Factors for GMPEs , 2011 .

[2]  Céline Gélis,et al.  A Study on the Variability of Kappa (κ) in a Borehole: Implications of the Computation Process , 2013 .

[3]  Benjamin Edwards,et al.  Reference S‐Wave Velocity Profile and Attenuation Models for Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations: Application to Japan , 2013 .

[4]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Reference Rock Site Condition for Central and Eastern North America , 2014 .

[5]  Chi-Chin Tsai,et al.  Learning of Dynamic Soil Behavior from Downhole Arrays , 2009 .

[6]  Mehmet Baris Darendeli,et al.  Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves , 2001 .

[7]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Estimates of Shear-Wave Q and κ0 for Unconsolidated and Semiconsolidated Sediments in Eastern North America , 2009 .

[8]  W. Silva,et al.  Site Amplification Functions for Central and Eastern North America – Part II: Modular Simulation-Based Models , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.

[9]  K. Campbell,et al.  Estimation of κ0 Implied by the High‐Frequency Shape of the NGA‐West2 Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations , 2016 .

[10]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Epistemic uncertainty and limitations of the κ0 model for near-surface attenuation at hard rock sites , 2015 .

[11]  Ellen M. Rathje,et al.  Evaluation of one-dimensional site response techniques using borehole arrays , 2015 .

[12]  N. Lam,et al.  Near-surface attenuation modelling based on rock shear-wave velocity profile , 2006 .

[13]  Benjamin Edwards,et al.  Attenuation of seismic shear wave energy in Switzerland , 2011 .

[14]  Tam Larkin,et al.  Hard‐Site κ0 (Kappa) Calculations for Christchurch, New Zealand, and Comparison with Local Ground‐Motion Prediction Models , 2014 .

[15]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Understanding the physics of kappa (κ): Insights from a downhole array , 2015 .

[16]  Walter I. Futterman,et al.  Dispersive body waves , 1962 .

[17]  J. Stewart,et al.  Elastic and Large-Strain Nonlinear Seismic Site Response from Analysis of Vertical Array Recordings , 2013 .

[18]  L. Bonilla,et al.  Estimation of Site‐Specific Kappa (κ0)‐Consistent Damping Values at KiK‐Net Sites to Assess the Discrepancy between Laboratory‐Based Damping Models and Observed Attenuation (of Seismic Waves) in the FieldEstimation of Site‐Specific Kappa (κ0)‐Consistent Damping Values at KiK‐Net Sites , 2017 .

[19]  Robert E. Kayen,et al.  A taxonomy of site response complexity , 2012 .

[20]  Susan E. Hough,et al.  High-frequency spectra observed at Anza, California: Implications for Q structure , 1988 .

[21]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  Taxonomy of κ: A Review of Definitions and Estimation Approaches Targeted to Applications , 2014 .

[22]  Hiroyuki Fujiwara,et al.  STRONG-MOTION SEISMOGRAPH NETWORK OPERATED BY NIED: K-NET AND KiK-net , 2004 .

[23]  John G. Anderson,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE SHAPE OF THE FOURIER AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM OF ACCELERATION AT HIGH FREQUENCIES , 1984 .

[24]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  Development of a Response Spectral Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) for Seismic‐Hazard Analysis from Empirical Fourier Spectral and Duration Models , 2015 .

[25]  W. Silva,et al.  Site Amplification Functions for Central and Eastern North America – Part I: Simulation Data Set Development , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.

[26]  Dino Bindi,et al.  Influence of Soil-Layer Properties on k Evaluation , 2004 .

[27]  Timothy D. Ancheta,et al.  NGA-West2 Site Database , 2014 .

[28]  W. Silva,et al.  NGA-West2 Database , 2014 .

[29]  D. Boore,et al.  Regional Correlations of VS30 and Velocities Averaged Over Depths Less Than and Greater Than 30 Meters , 2011 .

[30]  John Douglas,et al.  A κ Model for Mainland France , 2010 .

[31]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Dynamic Soil Properties, Seismic Downhole Arrays and Applications in Practice , 2001 .

[32]  L. M. Baker,et al.  Attenuation near Anza, California , 1988 .

[33]  Stéphane Drouet,et al.  vS30, κ, regional attenuation and Mw from accelerograms: application to magnitude 3–5 French earthquakes , 2010 .

[34]  Christine A. Goulet,et al.  A Flatfile for the KiK-net Database Processed Using an Automated Protocol , 2016 .

[35]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  NGA-West2 Empirical Fourier and Duration Models to Generate Adjustable Response Spectra , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.