Multi-projectors and implicit interaction in persuasive public displays

Recent advances in computer video projection open up new possibilities for real-time interactive, persuasive displays. Now a display can continuously adapt to a viewer so as to maximize its effectiveness. However, by the very nature of persuasion, these displays must be both immersive and subtle. We have been working on technologies that support this application including multi-projector and implicit interaction techniques. These technologies have been used to create a series of interactive persuasive displays that are described.

[1]  A ParadisoJoseph.  Tracking contact and free gesture across large interactive surfaces , 2003 .

[2]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing , 2000, TCHI.

[3]  Greg Welch,et al.  Shader Lamps: Animating Real Objects With Image-Based Illumination , 2001, Rendering Techniques.

[4]  Kent Wittenburg.  Research on Public, Community, and Situated Displays at MERL Cambridge , 2002 .

[5]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[6]  Julie Khaslavsky,et al.  Understanding the seductive experience , 1999, CACM.

[7]  Claudio S. Pinhanez,et al.  An Architecture and Framework for Steerable Interface Systems , 2003, UbiComp.

[8]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[9]  Claudio S. Pinhanez,et al.  Augmenting a retail environment using steerable interactive displays , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  John Underkoffler,et al.  A view from the Luminous Room , 1997, Personal Technologies.

[11]  W. Brent Seales,et al.  Multi-projector displays using camera-based registration , 1999, Proceedings Visualization '99 (Cat. No.99CB37067).

[12]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Natural video matting using camera arrays , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  Ruigang Yang,et al.  PixelFlex: a reconfigurable multi-projector display system , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[14]  Ramesh Raskar,et al.  Immersive planar display using roughly aligned projectors , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[15]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  A self-correcting projector , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[16]  W. Brent Seales,et al.  Dynamic shadow removal from front projection displays , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[17]  Adam Finkelstein,et al.  Automatic alignment of high-resolution multi-projector displays using an uncalibrated camera , 2000, Proceedings Visualization 2000. VIS 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37145).

[18]  Joseph A. Paradiso.  Tracking contact and free gesture across large interactive surfaces , 2003, CACM.

[19]  Peter Tandler,et al.  Collaboration with Interactive Walls and Tables , 2002 .

[20]  James M. Rehg,et al.  Projected light displays using visual feedback , 2002, 7th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, 2002. ICARCV 2002..

[21]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers , 2002, CHI.

[22]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  The Brain Opera Technology: New Instruments and Gestural Sensors for Musical Interaction and Performance , 1999 .

[23]  Claudio S. Pinhanez,et al.  Embedding Interactions in a Retail Store Environment: The Design and Lessons Learned , 2003, INTERACT.

[24]  Ramesh Raskar,et al.  Cartoon dioramas in motion , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[25]  Pierre David Wellner,et al.  Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk , 1993, CACM.

[26]  JeroenvanBaar RameshRaskar,et al.  A Low-Cost Projector Mosaic with Fast Registration , 2002 .

[27]  Anselmo Lastra,et al.  Life-sized projector-based dioramas , 2001, VRST '01.