Image resolution impact analysis on pedestrian detection in smart cities surveillance

In the paradigm of smart cities1, video surveillance is becoming a widely-applied technology to help improve the quality of human life in the era of digital living, where pedestrian detection is one of the key components for people-centered smart cities applications including wellbeing, security, traffic guiding, and unmanned vehicles, etc. While so far most surveillance cameras are of low quality resolution for cost-saving reasons, the impact of the image resolution on detection accuracy becomes a concerned issue. Though lower resolution can save the cost as well as the processing time, it has not been clearly reported how the resolution can impact on the detection accuracy. In this paper, we investigate the limit of low-resolution cameras with regards to the accuracy of the pedestrian detection, and experimentally demonstrate its impact on the most widely-applied HOG-SVM pedestrian detector, which is a combination of Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) for pedestrian detection. From our experiments, it is found that there is an optimal resolution to balance between speed and accuracy, while we show in our experiments that the resolution has apparent influence on both the accuracy and the computing time.

[1]  Shuicheng Yan,et al.  An HOG-LBP human detector with partial occlusion handling , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  A Trainable System for Object Detection , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Detecting Pedestrians Using Patterns of Motion and Appearance , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  B. Schiele,et al.  How Far are We from Solving Pedestrian Detection? , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[5]  Ming Yang,et al.  Regionlets for Generic Object Detection , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  Osama Masoud,et al.  A novel method for tracking and counting pedestrians in real-time using a single camera , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[7]  Dariu Gavrila,et al.  A Multilevel Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Pedestrian Classification , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[9]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Pedestrian Detection: An Evaluation of the State of the Art , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Meng Wang,et al.  Transferring a generic pedestrian detector towards specific scenes , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Anton van den Hengel,et al.  Strengthening the Effectiveness of Pedestrian Detection with Spatially Pooled Features , 2014, ECCV.

[12]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Detecting Pedestrians Using Patterns of Motion and Appearance , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  New features and insights for pedestrian detection , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Junjie Yan,et al.  Multi-pedestrian detection in crowded scenes: A global view , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  George Chen,et al.  Pedestrian Detection and Tracking Using HOG and Oriented-LBP Features , 2011, NPC.

[16]  Lionel M. Ni,et al.  Visual Analytics in Urban Computing: An Overview , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[17]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Ten Years of Pedestrian Detection, What Have We Learned? , 2014, ECCV Workshops.

[18]  Deva Ramanan,et al.  Steerable part models , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.