Literature Retrieval for Interdisciplinary Syntheses

THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS SUGGESTIONS for retrieval of bibliographic data: (1) by those interested in revealing interdisciplinarity, and (2) by those interested in being interdisciplinary. It is the latter who are most likely to produce interdisciplinary syntheses. Retrieval depends on bibliographic markers of various kinds, some of which divide disciplines. A major bibliographic indicator of interdisciplinarity is occurrence of the same marker on both sides of a disciplinary divide. Bibliographic markers, however, are not reliable for distinguishing lesser kinds of syntheses from high-level integrations ofsubstance. Dialog's RANK command is demonstrated as a means of revealing interdisciplinarity in any field, using various search terms as starting points in LC MARC-Books and the citation databases of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Next discussed are retrieval techniques for persons who are interested in synthesizing work from their own discipline (e.g., library and information science) with work from another discipline. Searchers can begin with authors or subjects from outside their own field and learn how these have been used within it, or they can begin with authors or subjects from within their own field and learn how these have been used outside it. Examples are given for all retrieval techniques. Interspersed are discussions of creativity, the connection of hitherto unconnected literatures, the retrieval and assessment of syntheses, and the nature of library browsing.

[1]  J. Branin The landscape of literatures: Use of subject collections in a university library , 1984 .

[2]  D. Nicholas,et al.  Literature and Bibliometrics , 1978 .

[3]  D. Swanson Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge. , 1990, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[4]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Biotechnology in Context: A Database-Filtering Approach to Identifying Core and Productive Non-Core Journals Supporting Multidisciplinary R. & D , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  N. Roberts,et al.  Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority: P. Wilson. London: Greenwood Press, 1983. 210 pp. ISBN 0 313 23763 8. £28.95. , 1985 .

[6]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Intervening in the Life Cycles of Scientific Knowledge Patrick Wilson, The Value of Currency , 1993, Libr. Trends.

[7]  Edwin B. Parker,et al.  : Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy , 1978 .

[8]  W. Grabe,et al.  Aspects of text structure : an investigation of the lexical organisation of text , 1987 .

[9]  Clare Beghtol,et al.  'Facets' as Interdisciplinary undiscovered Public Knowledge: S.R. Ranganathan in India and L. Guttman in Israel , 1995, J. Documentation.

[10]  Michael D. Gordon,et al.  Toward Discovery Support Systems: A Replication, Re-Examination, and Extension of Swanson's Work on Literature-Based Discovery of a Connection between Raynaud's and Fish Oil , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Deirdre Wilson,et al.  Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension , 1998 .

[12]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences: Implications for Library Organization , 1992 .

[13]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[15]  Stephen P. Harter,et al.  Psychological Relevance and Information Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  L. B. Heilprin Foundations of information science reexamined , 1989 .

[17]  A. J. Meadows Diffusion of Information Across the Sciences , 1976 .

[18]  Bonnie Snow RANK: a new tool for analyzing search results on DIALOG , 1993 .

[19]  E J Koopman,et al.  Child custody mediation: an interdisciplinary synthesis. , 1988, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[20]  Howard D. White Cocited author retrieval , 1986 .

[21]  P. Sandstrom An Optimal Foraging Approach to Information Seeking and Use , 1994, The Library Quarterly.

[22]  J. Swales CITATION ANALYSIS AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS , 1986 .

[23]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  For information specialists : interpretations of reference and bibliographic work , 1994 .

[24]  H. Gardner The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution , 1985 .

[25]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[26]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[27]  James D. Neeley,et al.  The management and social science literatures: An interdisciplinary cross-citation analysis , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Précis of The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  Stephen Paul Foster,et al.  For Information Specialists: Interpretations of Reference and Bibliographic Work , 1994 .

[30]  S. Berrol Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice , 1992 .

[31]  M. Hoey On the surface of discourse , 1983 .

[32]  Howard D. White,et al.  SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION AND LITERATURE RETRIEVAL , 2019, The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis.

[33]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Contrasting Assessments of Interdisciplinarity in Emerging Specialties , 1994 .

[34]  B. Vickery,et al.  SOCIAL SCIENCE LITERATURE USE IN THE UK AS INDICATED BY CITATIONS , 1969 .

[35]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Innovative behavior and communication , 1972 .