Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals

AbstractIntroduction In the last decade, several journal’s editors decided to publish alternative bibliometric indices parallel to the impact factor (IF): Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), Eigenfactor Score (ES) and CiteScore™ (CiteScore); however, there is scarce information about the correlations among them. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the associations between this bibliometrics in the Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging category of the Web of Knowledge. We hypothesized the IF did not show the best correlation with other metrics. MethodsRetrospective study. We used bibliometrics recorded from the 2017 publicly available versions of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), SJR (www.scimagojr.com), SNIP (www.journalindicators.com), and CiteScore (www.scopus.com); we also included the Total Cites. We measured the correlations using the Spearman correlation coefficients (RS) for all combinations of the bivariate pair, performed pairwise comparisons of the RS values, and calculated the coefficients of determination. We also tested the statistical significance of the difference between r coefficients between groups. All analyses were conducted with the JMP Pro software.ResultsThe stronger bivariate correlations were represented by the ES↔Total Cites RS = 0.968, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.937; and the CiteScore↔SJR RS = 0.911, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.829. From 105 possible combinations of pairwise comparisons, 38 depicted a p value > 0.050 which would suggest interchangeability among bivariate correlations.ConclusionsOur findings support our hypothesis that the IF does not show the best correlation between other metrics. Radiologists, interventional radiologist, or nuclear medicine doctors should have a clear understanding of the associations among the journal’s bibliometrics for their decision-making during the manuscript submission phase.

[1]  Seena Fazel,et al.  What is the impact of a research publication? , 2017, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[2]  A. Jackson The impact factor game: the rising impact factor of the British Journal of Radiology--a success story? , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  E. Garfield Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? , 1996 .

[4]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  How to Rank Journals , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  S. Ramin,et al.  Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. , 2012, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[6]  J. Fenton,et al.  Alternatives to the impact factor. , 2014, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[7]  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez,et al.  Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation: multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals , 2015, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[8]  Dulce Aparecida Barbosa,et al.  Bibliometric indicators of the nursing journals according to the index databases. , 2017, Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.

[9]  Harris L Cohen,et al.  Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  E. Krauskopf The uses and abuses of bibliometrics. , 2012, Reproductive Biomedicine Online.

[11]  B. Reider Brace for Impact , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  Richard van Noorden Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival , 2016, Nature.

[13]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Eigenfactor™ Metrics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  E. Roldán-Valadez,et al.  Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals , 2018, La radiologia medica.

[15]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ Metrics , 2008, Neurology.

[16]  Ewen Callaway,et al.  Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric , 2016, Nature.

[17]  Declining impact factor of radiologic journals: a matter for debate. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Pharmaceuticals: Impact Factor or CiteScore™. , 2017 .

[19]  Anja Šterbenc,et al.  Elsevier’s CiteScore index values for Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica: a 2016 update , 2017, Acta dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica, et Adriatica.

[20]  J. Barbet,et al.  Contribution of [64Cu]-ATSM PET in molecular imaging of tumour hypoxia compared to classical [18F]-MISO--a selected review. , 2011, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[21]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective , 2015, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  F. Pérez G,et al.  [An analysis of Chilean biomedical publications in PubMed in the years 2008-2009]. , 2015, Revista medica de Chile.

[23]  David B Elliott,et al.  The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez,et al.  Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics , 2018, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[25]  Richard Van Noorden Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival , 2016, Nature.

[26]  A. Pradhan,et al.  Impact factor of a scientific journal: Is it a measure of quality of research? , 2013, Journal of medical physics.

[27]  Aderemi A. Atayero,et al.  Citation analytics: Data exploration and comparative analyses of CiteScores of Open Access and Subscription-Based publications indexed in Scopus (2014–2016) , 2018, Data in brief.

[28]  Ramin Sadeghi,et al.  Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals , 2014, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[29]  S. Sachdeva,et al.  Journal Impact Factor: Its Use, Significance and Limitations , 2014, World journal of nuclear medicine.

[30]  Pharmaceuticals: Impact Factor or CiteScore™ , 2017, Pharmaceuticals.

[31]  S. Czernichow,et al.  The Eigenfactor™ Score in Highly Specific Medical Fields , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[32]  E. Roldán-Valadez,et al.  Alternative bibliometrics from the web of knowledge surpasses the impact factor in a 2-year ahead annual citation calculation: Linear mixed-design models' analysis of neuroscience journals , 2018, Neurology India.

[33]  S. Rawat How is impact factor impacting our research? , 2014, Biomedical journal.

[34]  Ted Brown,et al.  Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals , 2019, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[35]  Chan Yh,et al.  Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. , 2003 .

[36]  C. Baethge Impact factor--a useful tool, but not for all purposes. , 2012, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.