Documenting Improvement in College Writing

This investigation sought normative longitudinal change in student writing during college. It used a random sample of students (N=64), each of whom had produced essays at two points in their undergraduate careers, matriculation and junior year. Measures were writing features showing undergraduate change toward competent, working-world performance. From a principal-components factoring of variables used in a previous study, nine measures were selected as good representatives of nine factors—factors of independent and bound ideas, idea elaboration and substantiation, local cohesion, establishment of logical boundaries, free modification, fluency, and vocabulary. When applied to the 1st-year and junior-year writing, eight of the nine measures, including a holistic rating, recorded statistically significant change, all in the direction of workplace performance. Directions for further research are discussed.

[1]  M. Sternglass.  Writing Development as Seen through Longitudinal Research , 1993 .

[2]  Anne S. Davis,et al.  The Stability of T-Unit Length in the Written Discourse of College Freshmen: A Second Study. , 1982 .

[3]  Ruth Spack.  The Acquisition of Academic Literacy in a Second Language , 1997 .

[4]  Andrew Kerek.  Sentence Combining and College Composition. , 1980 .

[5]  Davida Charney.  Empiricism Is not a Four-Letter Word. , 1996 .

[6]  Lester Faigley.  Names in Search of a Concept: Maturity, Fluency, Complexity, and Growth in Written Syntax. , 1980 .

[7]  J. Adam,et al.  Sequential Strategies and the Separation of Age, Cohort, and Time-of-Measurement Contributions to Developmental Data. , 1978 .

[8]  James Britton,et al.  The development of writing abilities , 1975 .

[9]  Francis Christensen.  Notes toward a New Rhetoric , 1963 .

[10]  Christina Haas,et al.  Learning to Read Biology , 1994 .

[11]  Francis Christensen.  The Problem of Defining a Mature Style , 1968 .

[12]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  The Impact of Content and Mechanics on Judgments of Writing Quality , 1984 .

[13]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Language - The Loaded Weapon : The Use and Abuse of Language Today , 1980 .

[14]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  Writing in the College Years: Some Indices of Growth , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[15]  Gary Grobe.  Syntactic Maturity, Mechanics, and Vocabulary as Predictors of Quality Ratings. , 1981 .

[16]  Richard H. Haswell.  Rubrics, prototypes, and exemplars: Categorization theory and systems of writing placement , 1998 .

[17]  Richard H. Haswell.  Multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests , 1998 .

[18]  W. Wolcott.  A Longitudinal Study of Six Developmental Students' Performance in Reading and Writing. , 1994 .

[19]  Joseph M. Williams,et al.  Style and Its Consequences: Do as I Do, Not as I Say. , 1981 .

[20]  Collin T. Ballance,et al.  A Comparison of Sentence Connective Recall by Two Populations of Readers , 1980 .

[21]  Francis J. Sullivan.  Calling writers' bluffs: The social production of writing ability in university placement-testing , 1997 .

[22]  Richard H. Haswell.  Textual Research and Coherence: Findings, Intuition, Application. , 1989 .