Study of depth bias of observers in free viewing of still stereoscopic synthetic stimuli

Observers' fixations exhibit a marked bias towards certain areas on the screen when viewing scenes on computer monitors. For instance, there exists a well-known "center-bias" which means that fixations are biased towards the center of the screen during the viewing of 2D still images. In the viewing of 3D content, stereoscopic displays enhance depth perception by the mean of binocular parallax. This additional depth cue has a great influence on guiding eye movements. Relatively little is known about the impact of binocular parallax on visual attention of the 3D content displayed on stereoscopic screen. Several studies mentioned that people tend to look preferably at the objects located at certain positions in depth. But studies proving or quantifying this depth-bias are still limited. In this paper, we conducted a binocular eye-tracking experiment by showing synthetic stimuli on a stereoscopic display. Observers were required to do a free-viewing task through passive polarized glasses. Gaze positions of both eyes were recorded and the depth of eyes' fixation was determined. The stimuli used in the experiment were designed in such a way that the center-bias and the depth-bias affect eye movements individually. Results indicate the existence of a depth-bias: objects closer to the viewer attract attention earlier than distant objects, and the number of fixations located on objects varies as a function of objects' depth. The closest object in a scene always attracts most fixations. The fixation distribution along depth also shows a convergent behavior as the viewing time increases.

[1]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Saliency, attention, and visual search: an information theoretic approach. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Junle Wang,et al.  Quantifying how the combination of blur and disparity affects the perceived depth , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Donald H. House,et al.  Using eye tracking to analyze stereoscopic filmmaking , 2009, SIGGRAPH '09.

[6]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of rinocular single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Atsuto Maki,et al.  A computational model of depth-based attention , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Christel Chamaret,et al.  Adaptive 3D rendering based on region-of-interest , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Benjamin W Tatler,et al.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[12]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Junle Wang,et al.  Quantifying the relationship between visual salience and visual importance , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  The Importance of Visual Attention in Improving the 3D-TV Viewing Experience: Overview and New Perspectives , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[15]  F. A. Miles Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[17]  David J Heeger,et al.  Stereoscopic processing of absolute and relative disparity in human visual cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.

[20]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  A coherent computational approach to model bottom-up visual attention , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  L. Itti,et al.  Quantifying center bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[22]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[23]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation , 1999, Nature.

[24]  Atsuto Maki,et al.  Attentional Scene Segmentation: Integrating Depth and Motion , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[25]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[26]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  NEW REQUIREMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR 3DTV , 2010 .

[27]  Peter König,et al.  Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[28]  Junle Wang,et al.  Quantifying depth bias in free viewing of still stereoscopic synthetic stimuli , 2011 .

[29]  Ken Chen,et al.  Stereoscopic Visual Attention Model for 3D Video , 2010, MMM.

[30]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Charles Wheatstone On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .