INFORMATION-CHANNEL PREFERENCES AND INFORMATION-OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES

Providing an empirical base to flesh out the notion of ‘information capital’, this article charts the elusive linkages between information-seeking practices, vocational preferences, and information-opportunity structures. Drawing on data from focus group interviews with over 300 advantaged and disadvantaged students, the research examines the information-seeking practices and circumstances of students attending high schools in an agricultural region of California. The article outlines a novel typology of four distinctive information-seeking situations: Internet-reliant information-seeking (IRIS), personal community-reliant information-seeking (PCRIS), educator-reliant information-seeking (ERIS), and multi-channel information-seeking (MCIS). Each of these situations brings together particular information-seeking strategies with specific vocational and educational preferences and particular information-opportunity structures. The four groups of information-seekers exhibit distinctive internalized stances towards what they define as appropriate information-seeking strategies and useful information-channels for educational and career planning. Illustrating these patterns, the article uncovers the connections between students’ educational and career aspirations, on the one hand, and their online and offline information-seeking strategies, on the other hand. By drawing these connections, the analysis provides rich empirical scaffolding for the concepts of information-channel preferences and information-opportunity structures as they relate to information capital, concepts which have remained empirically underdeveloped.

[1]  Cees J. Hamelink,et al.  The ethics of cyberspace , 2001 .

[2]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[3]  James C. Witte,et al.  The Internet and Social Inequalities , 2009 .

[4]  Heidi E. Julien,et al.  Barriers to Adolescents' Information Seeking for Career Decision Making , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Saskia Sassen,et al.  Towards a Sociology of Information Technology , 2002 .

[6]  Shameeka M. Jelenewicz,et al.  A Disappearing Digital Divide Among College Students? , 2006 .

[7]  Kristin Luker,et al.  Salsa dancing into the social sciences : research in an age of info-glut , 2008 .

[8]  S. Sassen.  Electronic space and power , 1997 .

[9]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Coming of age with the internet , 2006, New Media Soc..

[10]  G. Mesch,et al.  Wired Youth: The Social World of Adolescence in the Information Age , 2010 .

[11]  Barbara Schneider,et al.  The ambitious generation : America's teenagers, motivated but directionless , 2000 .

[12]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[13]  Annette Lareau.  Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life , 2003 .

[14]  Laura Nichols.  Giving Students a Voice: Learning Through Autobiography , 2004 .

[15]  F. W. Vondracek,et al.  Vocational Preferences of Early Adolescents , 1999 .

[16]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[17]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Nalini P. Kotamraju.  Art versus Code: The Gendered Evolution of Web Design Skills , 2004 .

[19]  R. Pahl,et al.  Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today , 2006 .

[20]  D. Blustein,et al.  Individual and contextual factors in career exploration. , 1988 .

[21]  Laura Robinson.  A TASTE FOR THE NECESSARY , 2009 .

[22]  S. Holloway,et al.  Cyberkids : children in the information age , 2003 .