On Near Misses and Completed Tasks

What is the nature and function of relief? Relief has been studied little in psychological science despite its familiarity and pervasiveness. Two studies revealed that relief can result from two distinct situations: the narrow avoidance of an aversive outcome (near-miss relief) and completion of an onerous or aversive event (task-completion relief). Study 1 found that recollections of near-miss relief were marked by more downward counterfactual thoughts and greater feelings of social isolation than recollections of task-completion relief. Study 2 experimentally elicited the two types of relief and found mediational evidence that relief following near misses elicits feelings of social isolation via its stimulation of counterfactual thinking. That near-miss relief is characterized by counterfactual thinking suggests that it prompts people to contemplate how to avert similar experiences in the future, whereas task-completion relief may serve to reinforce endurance during difficult tasks.

[1]  R. Guttentag,et al.  Children's understanding of anticipatory regret and disappointment , 2008 .

[2]  N. Roese,et al.  The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[3]  K. Markman,et al.  Downward Counterfactuals and Motivation: The Wake-Up Call and the Pangloss Effect , 2000 .

[4]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[5]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Maria L. Cronley,et al.  Debiasing omission neglect , 2006 .

[7]  Ira J. Roseman,et al.  Appraisals cause experienced emotions: Experimental evidence , 2004 .

[8]  N. Roese,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking Facilitates Behavioral Intentions. , 2009, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[9]  M. Leary,et al.  The Motivated Expression of Embarrassment Following a Self‐Presentational Predicament , 1996 .

[10]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[11]  C. Carver,et al.  Threat sensitivity, incentive sensitivity, and the experience of relief. , 2009, Journal of personality.

[12]  D. Cicchetti.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[13]  S. Lyubomirsky,et al.  Rethinking Rumination , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  P. Shaver,et al.  Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  B. Fredrickson.  What Good Are Positive Emotions? , 1998, Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association.

[17]  K. Teigen.  How good is good luck? The role of counterfactual thinking in the perception of lucky and unlucky events , 1995 .

[18]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and Close-Call Counterfactuals: The Loser Who Nearly Won and the Winner Who Nearly Lost , 2000 .

[19]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  K. Vohs,et al.  How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[22]  N. Roese.  Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.