Binary SIPPER plankton image classification using random subspace

Plankton recognition plays an important role in the ocean environmental research. In this paper, we propose a random subspace based algorithm to classify the plankton images detected in real time by the Shadowed Image Particle Profiling and Evaluation Recorder. The difficulty of such classification is multifold because the data sets are not only much noisier but the plankton are deformable, projection-variant, and often in partial occlusion. In addition, the images in our experiments are binary, thus are lack of texture information. Using random sampling, we construct a set of stable classifiers to take full advantage of nearly all the discriminative information in the feature space of plankton images. The combination of multiple stable classifiers is better than a single classifier. We achieve over 93% classification accuracy on a collection of more than 3000 images, making it comparable with what a trained biologist can achieve by using conventional manual techniques.

[1]  G. Matheron Random Sets and Integral Geometry , 1976 .

[2]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[3]  Scott Samson,et al.  A system for high-resolution zooplankton imaging , 2001 .

[4]  Andrea Trucco,et al.  High-resolution in situ holographic recording and analysis of marine organisms and particles (HOLOMAR) , 1998, IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society. OCEANS'98. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36259).

[5]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  He Huang,et al.  Automatic Plankton Image Recognition , 1998, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[7]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Random sampling LDA for face recognition , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[8]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[9]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Autoregressive and Fourier-Based Descriptors in 2D Shape Classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Andrew R. Webb,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1999 .

[11]  Ming-Kuei Hu,et al.  Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Decision Combination in Multiple Classifier Systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Feng Lin,et al.  Binary Plankton Image Classification , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[16]  Dacheng Tao,et al.  Random sampling based SVM for relevance feedback image retrieval , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[17]  Thomas H. Reiss,et al.  The revised Fundamental Theorem of Moment Invariants , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  C. Davis The Video Plankton Recorder (VPR) : Design and initial results , 1992 .

[19]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Shape Discrimination Using Fourier Descriptors , 1977, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  Guillermo Ayala,et al.  Spatial Size Distributions: Applications to Shape and Texture Analysis , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..