A new technique for calculating individual dermal fibroblast contractile forces generated within collagen-GAG scaffolds.

Cell-mediated contraction plays a critical role in many physiological and pathological processes, notably organized contraction during wound healing. Implantation of an appropriately formulated (i.e., mean pore size, chemical composition, degradation rate) three-dimensional scaffold into an in vivo wound site effectively blocks the majority of organized wound contraction and results in induced regeneration rather than scar formation. Improved understanding of cell contraction within three-dimensional constructs therefore represents an important area of study in tissue engineering. Studies of cell contraction within three-dimensional constructs typically calculate an average contractile force from the gross deformation of a macroscopic substrate by a large cell population. In this study, cellular solids theory has been applied to conventional column buckling relationships to quantify the magnitude of individual cell contraction events within a three-dimensional, collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold. This new technique can be used for studying cell mechanics with a wide variety of porous scaffolds that resemble low-density, open-cell foams. It extends previous methods for analyzing cell buckling of two-dimensional substrates to three-dimensional constructs. From data available in the literature, the mean contractile force (Fc) generated by individual dermal fibroblasts within the collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold was calculated to range between 11 and 41 nN (Fc=26+/-13 nN, mean+/-SD), with an upper bound of cell contractility estimated at 450 nN.

[1]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part I: modeling , 2001 .

[2]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Shear force at the cell-matrix interface: enhanced analysis for microfabricated post array detectors. , 2005, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.

[4]  I. Yannas,et al.  Cross-linking of Gelatine by Dehydration , 1967, Nature.

[5]  Elliot L Elson,et al.  The relationship between cell and tissue strain in three-dimensional bio-artificial tissues. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[6]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[7]  M. Dembo,et al.  Distinct roles of frontal and rear cell-substrate adhesions in fibroblast migration. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  M. Spector,et al.  Effects of cross-linking type II collagen-GAG scaffolds on chondrogenesis in vitro: dynamic pore reduction promotes cartilage formation. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[9]  P. Rubin,et al.  Inhibition of conjunctival scarring and contraction by a porous collagen-glycosaminoglycan implant. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  M. Glogauer,et al.  Transforming growth factor-beta induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin is dependent on the deformability of the collagen matrix. , 1999, Current topics in pathology. Ergebnisse der Pathologie.

[11]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Cellular materials as porous scaffolds for tissue engineering , 2001 .

[12]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[13]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[14]  Y. Pek,et al.  Micromechanics of fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. , 2001, Experimental cell research.

[15]  E Bell,et al.  Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Mark Eastwood,et al.  Quantitative analysis of collagen gel contractile forces generated by dermal fibroblasts and the relationship to cell morphology , 1996, Journal of cellular physiology.

[17]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[18]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[19]  M S Kolodney,et al.  Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: a quantitative study , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  M Eastwood,et al.  A culture force monitor for measurement of contraction forces generated in human dermal fibroblast cultures: evidence for cell-matrix mechanical signalling. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  M. Spector,et al.  Optimal Degradation Rate for Collagen Chambers Used for Regeneration of Peripheral Nerves over Long Gaps , 2004, Cells Tissues Organs.

[22]  L. Gibson,et al.  Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[23]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase is involved in mechanosensing during fibroblast migration , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B. C,et al.  Tensegrity and mechanoregulation : from skeleton to cytoskeleton , 1999 .

[25]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  P. Agache,et al.  A mechanical study of tense collagen lattices , 1996 .

[27]  M. Dembo,et al.  Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[28]  J. Silverman,et al.  Function of spindle microtubules in directing cortical movement and actin filament organization in dividing cultured cells. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[29]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold supports adult rat mesenchymal stem cell differentiation along osteogenic and chondrogenic routes. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[30]  I. Yannas,et al.  Preparation of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers for tissue regeneration. , 1999, Methods in molecular medicine.

[31]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[32]  Ioannis V. Yannas,et al.  Biologically Active Analogues of the Extracellular Matrix: Artificial Skin and Nerves† , 1990 .

[33]  L. Gibson,et al.  Creep does not contribute to fatigue in bovine trabecular bone. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[35]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[37]  M. Spector,et al.  Histological Changes in the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament After Rupture* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  Richard A.F. Clark,et al.  The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair , 2012, Springer US.

[39]  I. Yannas,et al.  Evidence for sequential utilization of fibronectin, vitronectin, and collagen during fibroblast‐mediated collagen contraction , 2002, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[40]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[41]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[42]  M. Green,et al.  Effect of gel re-organization and tensional forces on alpha2beta1 integrin levels in dermal fibroblasts. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[43]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Measurement of mechanical forces generated by skin fibroblasts embedded in a three-dimensional collagen gel. , 1991, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[44]  M Eastwood,et al.  Balanced mechanical forces and microtubule contribution to fibroblast contraction , 1996, Journal of cellular physiology.

[45]  L. Gibson,et al.  Size effects in ductile cellular solids, I: modeling , 2001 .

[46]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces in locomoting cells. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[47]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Differences in the Regulation of Fibroblast Contraction of Floating Versus Stressed Collagen Matrices* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[49]  M. Wolcott.  Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[50]  J. Perea,et al.  Isolation and RNA sequence analysis of cytochrome b mutants resistant to funiculosin, a center i inhibitor of the mitochondrial ubiquinol‐cytochrome c reductase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1990, FEBS letters.

[51]  Albert K. Harris,et al.  Fibroblast traction as a mechanism for collagen morphogenesis , 1981, Nature.

[52]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  An in vitro force measurement assay to study the early mechanical interaction between corneal fibroblasts and collagen matrix. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[53]  M. Sheetz,et al.  A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Y. Wang,et al.  High resolution detection of mechanical forces exerted by locomoting fibroblasts on the substrate. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[55]  G I Zahalak,et al.  A cell-based constitutive relation for bio-artificial tissues. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[56]  Ioannis V. Yannas,et al.  Tissue and organ regeneration in adults , 2001 .

[57]  M. Spector,et al.  Connective tissue response to tubular implants for peripheral nerve regeneration: The role of myofibroblasts , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[58]  I. Yannas,et al.  Design of an artificial skin. II. Control of chemical composition. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[59]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-β induction of α-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts , 1999 .

[60]  A. Desmoulière,et al.  The Role of the Myofibroblast in Wound Healing and Fibrocontractive Diseases , 1988 .

[61]  Patrick J Prendergast,et al.  The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2007, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[62]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[63]  M Eastwood,et al.  Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: Mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three‐dimensional substrates , 1998, Journal of cellular physiology.

[64]  M Eastwood,et al.  Effect of precise mechanical loading on fibroblast populated collagen lattices: morphological changes. , 1998, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[65]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of Cell Migration on the Maintenance of Tension on a Collagen Matrix , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[66]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads—II. Comparison of models with experiment , 1989 .

[67]  Edward Y Lee,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[69]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[70]  Ioannis V. Yannas,et al.  Collagen and Gelatin in the Solid State , 1972 .

[71]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[72]  T. M. Freyman.  Development of an in vitro model of contraction by fibroblasts , 2001 .

[73]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  H. P. Ting-Beall,et al.  The effects of osmotic stress on the viscoelastic and physical properties of articular chondrocytes. , 1999, Biophysical journal.