Multi-Faceted Recall of Continuous Active Learning for Technology-Assisted Review
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[2] Douglas W. Oard,et al. Overview of the TREC 2009 Legal Track , 2009, TREC.
[3] Douglas W. Oard,et al. Sequential testing in classifier evaluation yields biased estimates of effectiveness , 2013, SIGIR.
[4] Maura R. Grossman,et al. Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review , 2011 .
[5] Charles L. A. Clarke,et al. Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation , 2008, SIGIR '08.
[6] Douglas W. Oard,et al. Towards minimizing the annotation cost of certified text classification , 2013, CIKM.
[7] Yiming Yang,et al. RCV1: A New Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[8] Gordon V. Cormack,et al. Machine Learning for Information Retrieval: TREC 2009 Web, Relevance Feedback and Legal Tracks , 2009, TREC.
[9] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. Overview of the TREC 2006 , 2007, TREC.
[10] David C. Blair. STAIRS Redux: Thoughts on the STAIRS Evaluation, Ten Years after , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[11] Maura R. Grossman,et al. Evaluation of machine-learning protocols for technology-assisted review in electronic discovery , 2014, SIGIR.