The Estimation of Heritability with Unbalanced Data: I. Observations Available on Parents and Offspring

Hill and Nicholas (1974) and Thompson (1976) have recently discussed the design of experiments to estimate heritability when data are available on parents and offspring. They show the advantage of maximum likelihood (ML) methods over regression and sib covariance methods. They consider the efficiency of various balanced hierarchical designs, that is designs in which the same number of dams are mated to each sire and the same number of offspring are measured from each dam. In practice this balance is seldom attained and in this paper we consider estimation of heritability for unbalanced data. In balanced designs it is useful to divide the data into five parts due to differences within dams, between dams within sires, between sires with offspring, between animals with no offspring and between groups of animals with and without offspring (Thompson 1976). This partition suggests estimators in the unbalanced case but the weighting to be given to each full-sib and half-sib mean has yet to be decided. The weighting of the means has been discussed previously, in the context of using only the parent-offspring covariances, for example by Kempthorne and Tandon (1953) and Ollivier (1974), and in the context of using the sib covariances alone, for example Robertson (1962). The weighting to be given to the means is not obvious when we wish to use both the parent-offspririg and sib covariances efficiently and we use instead an ML procedure. We try to take advantage of the special structure of the data, noting that the formulation for the unbalanced case is completely different from the formulation for the balanced case. In Section 2 we discuss a model for the unbalanced case and give a suitable form for the variance-covariance structure. In Section 3 we use this structure to indicate how the parameters might be estimated. In Section 4 we indicate the modifications necessary when different models are assumed. The method we develop can be useful in the more general problem of estimating variance components and we discuss this in Section 4.

[1]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimation of heritability by both regression of offspring on parent and intra-class correlation of sibs in one experiment. , 1974, Biometrics.

[2]  D. Harville Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems , 1977 .

[3]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[4]  R. N. Curnow The Estimation of Repeatability and Heritability from Records Subject to Culling , 1961 .

[5]  Robin Thompson,et al.  The estimation of variance and covariance components with an application when records are subject to culling , 1973 .

[6]  R. Thompson,et al.  Design of experiments to estimate heritability when observations are available on parents and offspring. , 1976, Biometrics.

[7]  Alan Robertson,et al.  180. Note: Weighting in the Estimation of Variance Components in the Unbalanced Single Classification , 1962 .

[8]  L. Ollivier [The parent-offspring regression when the progeny is subdivided into families of unequal size]. , 1974, Biometrics.

[9]  H. Hartley,et al.  Computing Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Mixed A.O.V. Model Using the W Transformation , 1973 .

[10]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[11]  Frederick E. Smith,et al.  Matrix Algebra for the Biological Sciences , 1966 .

[12]  S. R. Searle Linear Models , 1971 .

[13]  S. R. Searle,et al.  The estimation of environmental and genetic trends from records subject to culling. , 1959 .