RHEOLOGICAL AND FLUIDIZATION BEHAVIOUR OF POWDERS OF DIFFERENT PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Abstract While the importance of fines in determining the rheological and fluidization behaviour of powders has been recognized by many research workers, there has been little previous work aimed at understanding and characterizing the influence of fines content. In this project two particulate materials, spent FCC and glass, were examined. For each material, the behaviour of three size distributions of essentially identical surface-volume mean diameter (53 and 73 μm) but different fines contents and size spectra was studied. In addition, two narrow-sized fractions with smaller and larger average size were investigated for comparison. Characterization to study the role of fines included shear, cohesion, fluidization and collapse tests. These tests were performed under carefully controlled conditions to minimize possible disturbances from surface effects due to moisture and attrition, and from changes in size distribution by elutriation and comminution. The flow and fluidization properties of powders were found to be influenced by the particle size distribution. Collapse test results are affected by the bed height chosen. The expansion capability of bubble-free fluidized beds correlate reasonably with the interparticle adhesion force found from shear tests. The common assumption that minimum bubbling occurs by separation of particle contacts following complete balancing of interparticle adhesion forces by the overall force of hydrodynamic drag is questionable.

[1]  G. Donsì,et al.  Cohesive forces between particles of fluid-bed catalysts , 1976 .

[2]  D. M. Walker,et al.  An annular shear cell for granular materials , 1968 .

[3]  Derek Geldart,et al.  The effect of particle size and size distribution on the behaviour of gas-fluidised beds , 1972 .

[4]  J. Rooda,et al.  A testing procedure for triaxial tests and a numerical method for the calculation of powder flow properties , 1977 .

[5]  L. Massimilla,et al.  Bubble‐free expansion of gas‐fluidized beds of fine particles , 1973 .

[6]  John R. Grace,et al.  The effect of particle size distribution on the performance of a catalytic fluidized bed reactor , 1990 .

[7]  J. Grace.  Contacting modes and behaviour classification of gas—solid and other two-phase suspensions , 1986 .

[8]  W. Schrämli.  On the measurement of the flow properties of cement , 1967 .

[9]  P. M. Heertjes,et al.  A condition diagram for some non-cohesive round glass particles , 1978 .

[10]  D. Geldart,et al.  Behaviour of gas-fluidized beds of fine powders part II. Voidage of the dense phase in bubbling beds , 1980 .

[11]  A. W. Jenike,et al.  A silo for ground anthracite , 1968 .

[12]  B. D. Bowen,et al.  Spout diameter variation in two-dimensional and cylindrical spouted beds: a theoretical models and its verification , 1989 .

[13]  Hans Rumpf,et al.  Einflüsse der Porosität und Korngrößenverteilung im Widerstandsgesetz der Porenströmung , 1971 .

[14]  O. Molerus,et al.  Theory of yield of cohesive powders , 1975 .

[15]  D. Geldart.  Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[16]  O. Molerus,et al.  Interpretation of Geldart's type A, B, C and D powders by taking into account interparticle cohesion forces , 1982 .

[17]  D. Geldart,et al.  Fluidization of powders showing degrees of cohesiveness—II. Experiments on rates of de-aeration , 1985 .

[18]  H. Kurz,et al.  The influence of particle size distribution on the flow properties of limestone powders , 1975 .

[19]  H. Rumpf.  Die Wissenschaft des Agglomerierens , 1974 .

[20]  D. Keairns,et al.  Particle segregation in a fluidized bed , 1975 .

[21]  Roland Clift,et al.  The effect of thin liquid layers on fluidisation characteristics , 1984 .

[22]  P. L. Bransby,et al.  Deaeration of powders in hoppers , 1980 .

[23]  O. Molerus,et al.  Effect of interparticle cohesive forces on the flow behaviour of powders , 1978 .