Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co‐cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures

Sequential uptake of pentose and hexose sugars that compose lignocellulosic biomass limits the ability of pure microbial cultures to efficiently produce value‐added bioproducts. In this work, we used dynamic flux balance modeling to examine the capability of mixed cultures of substrate‐selective microbes to improve the utilization of glucose/xylose mixtures and to convert these mixed substrates into products. Co‐culture simulations of Escherichia coli strains ALS1008 and ZSC113, engineered for glucose and xylose only uptake respectively, indicated that improvements in batch substrate consumption observed in previous experimental studies resulted primarily from an increase in ZSC113 xylose uptake relative to wild‐type E. coli. The E. coli strain ZSC113 engineered for the elimination of glucose uptake was computationally co‐cultured with wild‐type Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can only metabolize glucose, to determine if the co‐culture was capable of enhanced ethanol production compared to pure cultures of wild‐type E. coli and the S. cerevisiae strain RWB218 engineered for combined glucose and xylose uptake. Under the simplifying assumption that both microbes grow optimally under common environmental conditions, optimization of the strain inoculum and the aerobic to anaerobic switching time produced an almost twofold increase in ethanol productivity over the pure cultures. To examine the effect of reduced strain growth rates at non‐optimal pH and temperature values, a break even analysis was performed to determine possible reductions in individual strain substrate uptake rates that resulted in the same predicted ethanol productivity as the best pure culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108: 376–385. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  D. Ghosh,et al.  Transcriptional effects of CRP* expression in Escherichia coli , 2009, Journal of biological engineering.

[2]  Adam L. Meadows,et al.  Application of dynamic flux balance analysis to an industrial Escherichia coli fermentation. , 2010, Metabolic engineering.

[3]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  I. S. Pretorius,et al.  Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[5]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  BiGG: a Biochemical Genetic and Genomic knowledgebase of large scale metabolic reconstructions , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  John D. Wright,et al.  Xylose fermentation , 1989 .

[7]  Johannes P. van Dijken,et al.  The role of redox balances in the anaerobic fermentation of xylose by yeasts , 1983, European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology.

[8]  L. Vane,et al.  Kinetics of growth and ethanol production on different carbon substrates using genetically engineered xylose-fermenting yeast. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[9]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[10]  K. Sanderson,et al.  Uptake and catabolism of D-xylose in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  Eduardo Agosin,et al.  Modeling of yeast metabolism and process dynamics in batch fermentation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  Vincent J. Denef,et al.  Systems Biology: Functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[13]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Ethanol production from dilute-acid softwood hydrolysate by co-culture , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[14]  T. Jeffries,et al.  Engineering yeasts for xylose metabolism. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[15]  J. Keasling,et al.  Mathematical Model of the lac Operon: Inducer Exclusion, Catabolite Repression, and Diauxic Growth on Glucose and Lactose , 1997, Biotechnology progress.

[16]  S. Sawayama,et al.  Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  M. Taniguchi,et al.  Ethanol production from a mixture of glucose and xylose by a novel co-culture system with two fermentors and two microfiltration modules , 1997 .

[18]  B. Palsson,et al.  An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR) , 2003, Genome Biology.

[19]  D. Stahl,et al.  Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[20]  J. Förster,et al.  In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[21]  H. Lawford,et al.  Performance testing of Zymomonas mobilis metabolically engineered for cofermentation of glucose, xylose, and arabinose , 2002 .

[22]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. , 2004, Genome research.

[23]  I. Bari,et al.  Ethanol production in immobilized-cell bioreactors from mixed sugar syrups and enzymatic hydrolysates of steam-exploded biomass , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[24]  E. Boles,et al.  Characterization of the xylose-transporting properties of yeast hexose transporters and their influence on xylose utilization. , 2002, Microbiology.

[25]  Jack T Pronk,et al.  Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. , 2005, FEMS yeast research.

[26]  M. Beck,et al.  Ethanol production from glucose/xylose mixes by incorporating microbes in selected fermentation schemes , 1990 .

[27]  K. Shanmugam,et al.  Re-engineering Escherichia coli for ethanol production , 2008, Biotechnology Letters.

[28]  S. Leschine,et al.  Ethanol production from cellulose by a coculture ofZymomonas mobilis and a clostridium , 2005, Current Microbiology.

[29]  M. A. Henson,et al.  Genome‐scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fed‐batch culture , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  T. W. Jeffries,et al.  Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status , 2003, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[31]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[32]  F. Doyle,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Mukund Thattai,et al.  Flipping DNA to Generate and Regulate Microbial Consortia , 2010, Genetics.

[34]  M. Sedlák,et al.  DNA microarray analysis of the expression of the genes encoding the major enzymes in ethanol production during glucose and xylose co-fermentation by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces yeast , 2003 .

[35]  W. Epstein,et al.  Phosphorylation of D-glucose in Escherichia coli mutants defective in glucosephosphotransferase, mannosephosphotransferase, and glucokinase , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  M. Taniguchi,et al.  Ethanol production from a mixture of glucose and xylose by co-culture of Pichia stipitis and a respiratory-deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997 .

[37]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effect of pH oscillations on a competing mixed culture , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  H. Lawford,et al.  Relative rates of sugar utilization by an ethanologenic recombinantEscherichia coli using mixtures of glucose, mannose, and xylose , 1994, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[39]  Sarah A. Lee,et al.  A co-fermentation strategy to consume sugar mixtures effectively , 2008, Journal of biological engineering.

[40]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Genome-scale microbial in silico models: the constraints-based approach. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[41]  K. Shanmugam,et al.  Genetic improvement of Escherichia coli for ethanol production: chromosomal integration of Zymomonas mobilis genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[42]  Hung Lee,et al.  Genetic improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[43]  V. M. dos Santos,et al.  Consortia modulation of the stress response: proteomic analysis of single strain versus mixed culture. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.