Contralesional Brain–Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Background and Purpose— There are few effective therapies to achieve functional recovery from motor-related disabilities affecting the upper limb after stroke. This feasibility study tested whether a powered exoskeleton driven by a brain–computer interface (BCI), using neural activity from the unaffected cortical hemisphere, could affect motor recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. This novel system was designed and configured for a home-based setting to test the feasibility of BCI-driven neurorehabilitation in outpatient environments. Methods— Ten chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe upper-limb motor impairment (mean Action Research Arm Test=13.4) used a powered exoskeleton that opened and closed the affected hand using spectral power from electroencephalographic signals from the unaffected hemisphere associated with imagined hand movements of the paretic limb. Patients used the system at home for 12 weeks. Motor function was evaluated before, during, and after the treatment. Results— Across patients, our BCI-driven approach resulted in a statistically significant average increase of 6.2 points in the Action Research Arm Test. This behavioral improvement significantly correlated with improvements in BCI control. Secondary outcomes of grasp strength, Motricity Index, and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure also significantly improved. Conclusions— The findings demonstrate the therapeutic potential of a BCI-driven neurorehabilitation approach using the unaffected hemisphere in this uncontrolled sample of chronic stroke survivors. They also demonstrate that BCI-driven neurorehabilitation can be effectively delivered in the home environment, thus increasing the probability of future clinical translation. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02552368.

[1]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  Unique Cortical Physiology Associated With Ipsilateral Hand Movements and Neuroprosthetic Implications , 2008, Stroke.

[2]  P. Matthews,et al.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–Machine Interfaces in Stroke Neurorehabilitation , 2015 .

[4]  J. B. Green,et al.  High-resolution EEG in poststroke hemiparesis can identify ipsilateral generators during motor tasks. , 1999, Stroke.

[5]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[6]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[7]  P. Roland,et al.  Activity in the human primary motor cortex related to ipsilateral hand movements , 1994, Brain Research.

[8]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Multimodal Sensory Feedback Associated with Motor Attempts Alters BOLD Responses to Paralyzed Hand Movement in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2014, Brain Topography.

[9]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  The EXCITE Stroke Trial: Comparing Early and Delayed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2010, Stroke.

[10]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke , 2015, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[11]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[13]  B. Rosen,et al.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[14]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infraction , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[17]  David T. Bundy,et al.  Using ipsilateral motor signals in the unaffected cerebral hemisphere as a signal platform for brain–computer interfaces in hemiplegic stroke survivors , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  The Role of Multiple Contralesional Motor Areas for Complex Hand Movements after Internal Capsular Lesion , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Rabadi,et al.  Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[23]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Upstream Dysfunction of Somatomotor Functional Connectivity After Corticospinal Damage in Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Brain plasticity in recovery from stroke: An MEG assessment , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  Carolyn Bodiam The Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the Assessment of Outcome on a Neurorehabilitation Unit , 1999 .

[27]  Brittany M. Young,et al.  Changes in functional connectivity correlate with behavioral gains in stroke patients after therapy using a brain-computer interface device , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[28]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Nick S. Ward,et al.  Changes in the location of cortico-muscular coherence following stroke☆ , 2012, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[30]  C. Lang,et al.  Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[31]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[32]  S. Page,et al.  Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  H Rodgers,et al.  A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[34]  P. Schmalbrock,et al.  Functional MRI Evidence of Cortical Reorganization in Upper-Limb Stroke Hemiplegia Treated with Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[35]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[36]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[37]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.