Where View-based Theories Break Down: The Role of Structure in Shape Perception and Object Recognition

[1]  J. Hummel,et al.  Finding the Pope in the pizza: Abstract invariants and cognitive constraints on perceptual learning , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[3]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[4]  P. Cheng.  From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .

[5]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[6]  G. Humphreys,et al.  View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching , 1996 .

[7]  J. Hummel,et al.  An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description , 1996 .

[8]  J. Hummel,et al.  Categorical relations in shape perception. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[9]  I. Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .

[10]  M. Tarr,et al.  To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[12]  M. Tarr.  Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  J. Hummel.  Reference Frames and Relations in Computational Models of Object Recognition , 1994 .

[15]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  K Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. , 1993, Science.

[17]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  L. Shastri,et al.  From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[21]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  3-D Shape Recovery Using Distributed Aspect Matching , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  T. Poggio,et al.  Recognition and Structure from one 2D Model View: Observations on Prototypes, Object Classes and Symmetries , 1992 .

[23]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Bringing the Grandmother back into the Picture: A Memory-Based View of Object Recognition , 1990, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[24]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  P. Quinlan,et al.  Differing approaches to two-dimensional shape recognition. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  M. Tarr,et al.  When does Human Object Recognition use a Viewer-Centered Reference Frame? , 1990 .

[27]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  C. Gallistel.  The organization of learning , 1990 .

[29]  L. Rips.  Similarity, typicality, and categorization , 1989 .

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  S. Pinker,et al.  Connections and symbols , 1988 .

[32]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[33]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[34]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[35]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .