The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics

[1]  Sieghard Beller,et al.  Crossing grammar and biology for gender categorisations: investigating the gender congruency effect in generic nouns for animates , 2016 .

[2]  Yulia Esaulova,et al.  Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Gabriel Recchia,et al.  Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Benny B. Briesemeister,et al.  Avoid violence, rioting, and outrage; approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  D J K Mewhort,et al.  Memory as a hologram: an analysis of learning and recall. , 2015, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[6]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Tatsunori Matsui,et al.  Experimental Study of Aesthetic Evaluation to Multi-color Stimuli Using Semantic Differential Method:- Towards the Construction of an Artificial KANSEI System - , 2015 .

[8]  Omer Levy,et al.  Neural Word Embedding as Implicit Matrix Factorization , 2014, NIPS.

[9]  C. Westbury.  You Can’t Drink a Word: Lexical and Individual Emotionality Affect Subjective Familiarity Judgments , 2014, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[11]  Yong Yu,et al.  Learning Word Representation Considering Proximity and Ambiguity , 2014, AAAI.

[12]  Omer Levy,et al.  Linguistic Regularities in Sparse and Explicit Word Representations , 2014, CoNLL.

[13]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Koray Kavukcuoglu,et al.  Learning word embeddings efficiently with noise-contrastive estimation , 2013, NIPS.

[15]  Markus J. Hofmann,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: on emotion, context, and the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[17]  Geoffrey Zweig,et al.  Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations , 2013, NAACL.

[18]  Zachary Estes,et al.  The unexplained nature of reading. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[20]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[21]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[22]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[23]  K. Rastle,et al.  The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[24]  Cyrus Shaoul,et al.  Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[25]  R. Baayen,et al.  Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective , 2010 .

[26]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general , 2008 .

[27]  Lori Buchanan,et al.  WINDSOR: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[28]  J. Adelman,et al.  Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). , 2008, Emotion.

[29]  David A. Balota,et al.  Not All Negative Words Slow Down Lexical Decision and Naming Speed: Importance of Word Arousal , 2008 .

[30]  Nieuwenhuys.  Automatic Vigilance for Negative Words in Lexical Decision and Naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006) , 2008 .

[31]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[32]  Michael N Jones,et al.  Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. , 2007, Psychological review.

[33]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Contextual Diversity, Not Word Frequency, Determines Word-Naming and Lexical Decision Times , 2006, Psychological science.

[34]  Douglas L. T. Rohde,et al.  An Improved Model of Semantic Similarity Based on Lexical Co-Occurrence , 2005 .

[35]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[36]  L. Ou,et al.  A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part II: Colour emotions for two‐colour combinations , 2004 .

[37]  William S. Maki,et al.  Semantic distance norms computed from an electronic dictionary (WordNet) , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[38]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Effects of morphosyntactic gender features in bilingual language processing , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  L. Ou,et al.  A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours , 2004 .

[40]  E. Bates,et al.  Gender and lexical access in Bulgarian , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Lauren A. Schmidt,et al.  Sex, syntax and semantics. , 2003 .

[42]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Rethinking the Word Frequency Effect: The Neglected Role of Distributional Information in Lexical Processing , 2001, Language and speech.

[43]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Normsfor English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech Report C-1) , 1999 .

[44]  D. G. MacKay.  Gender in English, German, and other languages: Problems with the old theory, opportunities for the new , 1999 .

[45]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[46]  A. Mehrabian.  Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in Temperament , 1996 .

[47]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[48]  T. Konishi,et al.  The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study , 1993, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[49]  A. Mills,et al.  Acquisition of the natural-gender rule in English and German , 1986 .

[50]  Naomi S. Baron.  A reanalysis of english grammatical gender , 1971 .

[51]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .