Detection and estimation of partially-observed dynamical systems: an outer-measure approach

In real environments, it is seldom that physical dynamical systems can be observed without detection failures and without disturbances from the background. Yet, a vast majority of the literature regarding Bayesian inference for such systems ignore these undesired effects and assume that pre-processing can be applied to remove them. To some extent, this goes against the Bayesian philosophy which promotes the integration of the different aspects of the problem into a joint formulation. However, such a formulation usually involves a precise modelling of these adverse effects as well as the setting of the corresponding parameters, which is not always feasible or realistic. In this article, we propose to use outer measures of a certain form to allow for additional flexibility in the modelling of these effects within the Bayesian paradigm. It is shown that detection and estimation of partially-observed dynamical systems can be performed with little to no knowledge about the background disturbances and with only an upper bound on the probability of detection failure. It is conformed in simulations that such an approach can compete with standard methods even when the latter are given the true parameter values.

[1]  Esko Valkeila,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Volume II: General Theory and Structure, 2nd Edition by Daryl J. Daley, David Vere‐Jones , 2008 .

[2]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[3]  A.R. Runnalls,et al.  A Kullback-Leibler Approach to Gaussian Mixture Reduction , 2007 .

[4]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Integrated probabilistic data association , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  A. Doucet,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo methods for multitarget filtering with random finite sets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  David J. Salmond Mixture reduction algorithms for target tracking in clutter , 1990 .

[7]  Arnaud Doucet,et al.  On the conditional distributions of spatial point processes , 2011, Advances in Applied Probability.

[8]  J. Houssineau Parameter estimation with a class of outer probability measures , 2018, 1801.00569.

[9]  J. K. Hunter,et al.  Measure Theory , 2007 .

[10]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[11]  Jeremie Houssineau,et al.  Representation and estimation of stochastic populations , 2015 .

[12]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  Improved SMC implementation of the PHD filter , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[13]  Jeremie Houssineau,et al.  PHD filter with diffuse spatial prior on the birth process with applications to GM-PHD filter , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[14]  Pierre Del Moral,et al.  Particle Association Measures and Multiple Target Tracking , 2015 .

[15]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility Theory and Its Applications: Where Do We Stand? , 2015, Handbook of Computational Intelligence.

[16]  Adrian N. Bishop,et al.  Smoothing and Filtering with a Class of Outer Measures , 2017, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[17]  P. S. Maybeck,et al.  Cost-function-based gaussian mixture reduction for target tracking , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[18]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo algorithms for a class of outer measures , 2017, 1708.06489.

[19]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[20]  R. Mahler Multitarget Bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments , 2003 .