Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task

Oculomotor inhibition of return (O-IOR) is an increase in saccade latency prior to an eye movement to a recently fixated location compared to other locations. It has been proposed that this temporal O-IOR may have spatial consequences, facilitating foraging by inhibiting return to previously attended regions. In order to test this possibility, participants viewed arrays of objects and of words while their eye movements were recorded. Temporal O-IOR was observed, with equivalent effects for object and word arrays, indicating that temporal O-IOR is an oculomotor phenomenon independent of array content. There was no evidence for spatial inhibition of return (IOR). Instead, spatial facilitation of return was observed: participants were significantly more likely than chance to make return saccades and to re-fixate just-visited locations. Further, the likelihood of making a return saccade to an object or word was contingent on the amount of time spent viewing that object or word before leaving it. This suggests that, unlike temporal O-IOR, return probability is influenced by cognitive processing. Taken together, these results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that IOR functions as a foraging facilitator. The results also provide strong evidence for a different oculomotor bias that could serve as a foraging facilitator: saccadic momentum, a tendency to repeat the most recently executed saccade program. We suggest that models of visual attention could incorporate saccadic momentum in place of IOR.

[1]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[2]  I. Hooge,et al.  Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing , 2005, Vision Research.

[3]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Eye Movements and Visual Encoding During Scene Perception , 2009, Psychological science.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Area activation: a computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Peter König,et al.  Saccadic Momentum and Facilitation of Return Saccades Contribute to an Optimal Foraging Strategy , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Oculomotor inhibition of return , 2011 .

[8]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[9]  Ulrich W. Weger,et al.  Attention and Eye Movements in Reading , 2006, Psychological science.

[10]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[11]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Eye movement control in scene viewing and reading: evidence from the stimulus onset delay paradigm. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  L. Itti,et al.  Modeling the influence of task on attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[13]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[14]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[15]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[16]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Henderson,et al.  Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[18]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Do object refixations during scene viewing indicate rehearsal in visual working memory? , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[20]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does Oculomotor Inhibition of Return Influence Fixation Probability during Scene Search? This Strategy Would Require a Mechanism for Keeping Track of Visited Locations , 2022 .

[22]  Graham L. Pierce,et al.  Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Fruitful visual search: Inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  W. Joseph Macinnes,et al.  Inhibition of Return Biases Orienting During the Search of Complex Scenes , 2003, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[27]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[28]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  A computer vision model for visual-object-based attention and eye movements , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[29]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[30]  I. Hooge,et al.  Inhibition of saccade return (ISR): spatio-temporal properties of saccade programming , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  J. Henderson,et al.  Facilitation of return during scene viewing , 2009 .

[32]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[33]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Novelty Is Not Always the Best Policy , 2009, Psychological science.

[34]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  G. Zelinsky A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. , 2008, Psychological review.