Effects of Communication Medium on Interpersonal Perceptions: Don't Hang Up on the Telephone Yet

This paper uses a social psychological perspective to study the effectiveness of different media of communication and how they influence interactions in social groups and organizations. In particular, we are interested in the social richness of the media— how effectively they convey the personalities and intentions of their users. We studied CMC (email and chat) and voice telephony, and compared them with face-to-face interaction. Study 1 was a controlled laboratory study in which people got acquainted with a partner. Study 2 was a field survey in which employees reported on naturally occurring interactions at work that took place with people of varying levels of power (supervisor, peer, subordinate). The surprising result is that the telephone generally came out on top in both studies, suggesting that the telephone may provide the optimum blend of richness and presence for natural and satisfying interactions.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[3]  Michael Smilowitz,et al.  The Effects of Computer Mediated Communication on an Individual's Judgment: A Study Based on the Methods of Asch's Social Influence Experiment , 1988 .

[4]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[5]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness☆ , 1988 .

[6]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Social evaluations of teleconferencing , 1977 .

[7]  I. Pool,et al.  The Social Impact of the Telephone , 1978 .

[8]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[9]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[10]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[11]  Catherine A. Riordan,et al.  Impression Management in Organizations: Theory, Measurement, Practice , 1995 .

[12]  M. Zanna,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communications: The Focus Is on Me , 1990 .

[13]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. , 1997 .

[14]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  The self-monitor looks at the ingratiator1 , 1976 .

[15]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[17]  Russell Spears,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .

[18]  A. Buss.  Self-consciousness and social anxiety , 1980 .

[19]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[20]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and self-regulation , 1981 .

[22]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Ingratiation : an attributional approach , 1973 .

[23]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[24]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[25]  G. Keppel,et al.  Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. , 1990 .

[26]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[27]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[28]  G. Keppel.  Data analysis for research designs , 1990 .

[29]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[30]  Elena Rocco,et al.  Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact , 1998, CHI.