A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience
暂无分享,去创建一个
Barbara J. Juhasz | Yun-hsuan Lai | Michelle L Woodcock | Yun-Hsuan Lai | Michelle L. Woodcock | B. Juhasz
[1] Gary Libben,et al. Everything is Psycholinguistics: Material and Methodological Considerations in the Study of Compound Processing , 2005, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.
[2] L. Feldman. Modeling Morphological Processing , 2013 .
[3] David Poeppel,et al. Compound words and structure in the lexicon , 2007 .
[4] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.
[5] Sachiko Kinoshita,et al. Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .
[6] J. Hyönä,et al. The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .
[7] M. Gernsbacher. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[8] David A. Balota,et al. Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .
[9] M. Brysbaert,et al. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] D C Rubin,et al. Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[11] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.
[12] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] Gary Libben,et al. Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment , 1998, Brain and Language.
[14] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun–noun compounds , 2004, Brain and Language.
[15] Keith Rayner,et al. The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words , 2005 .
[16] Marco Marelli,et al. Frequency Effects in the Processing of Italian Nominal Compounds: Modulation of Headedness and Semantic Transparency , 2012 .
[17] R. Baayen,et al. Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .
[18] D. Balota,et al. Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .
[19] Michael J. Cortese,et al. Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[20] R. Johnston,et al. Age of acquisition and lexical processing , 2006 .
[21] Robin L. Hill,et al. Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .
[22] A. Pollatsek,et al. Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..
[24] Naveed A. Sheikh,et al. Sensorimotor and linguistic information attenuate emotional word processing benefits: an eye-movement study. , 2013, Emotion.
[25] W. F. Battig,et al. Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .
[26] Curt Burgess,et al. The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis , 1998 .
[27] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words , 2013, Behavior research methods.
[28] P. Atchley,et al. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] Victor Kuperman,et al. Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds , 2013 .
[30] Marianne Lloyd. Reducing the familiarity of conjunction lures with pictures. , 2013, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.
[31] Laurie Beth Feldman,et al. Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .
[32] R. Logie,et al. Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .
[33] C. Rotello,et al. Conjunction errors and semantic transparency , 2010, Memory & cognition.
[34] Michael J Cortese,et al. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[35] Michael J Cortese,et al. Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words , 2010, Memory.
[36] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Tangible Words are Recognized Faster: The Grounding of Meaning in Sensory and Perceptual Systems , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[37] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .
[38] J. V. van Berkum,et al. How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[39] H. J. Jaarsveld,et al. Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds , 1988 .
[40] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition , 2007 .
[41] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[42] D. Balota,et al. A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.
[43] Marc Brysbaert,et al. The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[44] Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al. Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .
[45] A. Inhoff,et al. Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[46] Steven Pack,et al. Benefits and costs. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).
[47] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Morphological dynamics in compound processing , 2008 .
[48] Penny M. Pexman,et al. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.
[49] Barbara J. Juhasz. Sentence context modifies compound word recognition: Evidence from eye movements , 2012 .
[50] A. Paivio,et al. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.
[51] Keith Rayner,et al. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[52] P. Atchley,et al. Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: little evidence for recollection. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[53] Michael J Cortese,et al. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[54] Michael J Cortese,et al. Age of acquisition estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[55] A. Krott,et al. Large constituent families help children parse compounds , 2005, Journal of Child Language.
[56] T. Odegard,et al. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[57] Dominiek Sandra,et al. On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .
[58] M. Paulshock,et al. Frequency of effects. , 1984, Hospital practice.
[59] Michael J Cortese,et al. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[60] Alan S. Brown,et al. Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: Toward specifying familiarity for compound words , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[61] Gary Libben,et al. Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.
[62] Michael J Cortese,et al. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[63] Daragh E. Sibley,et al. Individual Differences in Visual Word Recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project , 2012 .
[64] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds , 2011 .
[65] M. Brysbaert,et al. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.
[66] Victor Kuperman,et al. Accentuate the Positive: Semantic Access in English Compounds , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[67] A. Ellis. Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .
[68] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words , 2005 .
[69] Rebecca Treiman,et al. The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[70] Ben D. Amsel,et al. Perceptual and motor attribute ratings for 559 object concepts , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[71] Keith Rayner,et al. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[72] A. Paivio. Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .
[73] Keith Rayner,et al. Eye movements and parafoveal preview of compound words: Does morpheme order matter? , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[74] Robert Fiorentino,et al. Masked morphological priming of compound constituents , 2009 .
[75] M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al. Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[76] D. Cicchetti. Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .
[77] Pienie Zwitserlood,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .
[78] S. Andrews,et al. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .
[79] Allan Paivio,et al. Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[80] A. Pollatsek,et al. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[81] S. Andrews. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? , 1986 .
[82] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation? , 2011, Memory & cognition.
[83] Lee H. Wurm,et al. Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities , 2007 .
[84] Sally Andrews,et al. Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification , 2003 .
[85] R. Baayen,et al. Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[86] C. L. Cushman,et al. Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Pure Alexia , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[87] M. Carreiras,et al. The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[88] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? , 2009 .
[89] K. Forster,et al. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .
[90] Lars Placke,et al. Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[91] Davide Crepaldi,et al. Seeing stems everywhere: position-independent identification of stem morphemes. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[92] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Effects of morphological families on English compound word recognition: A multitask investigation , 2011 .
[93] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Parafoveal processing within and between words , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[94] Michael J Cortese,et al. Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[95] Robert Schreuder,et al. The Processing and Representation of Dutch and English Compounds: Peripheral Morphological and Central Orthographic Effects , 2002, Brain and Language.
[96] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. , 2008, British journal of psychology.
[97] Gary Libben,et al. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness , 2003, Brain and Language.
[98] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[99] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The processing of compound words in English: Effects of word length on eye movements during reading , 2008 .
[100] Kevin A Hallgren,et al. Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.
[101] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition , 2004 .
[102] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary , 2010, Cognition.