Optimal WSN Deployment Models for Air Pollution Monitoring

Air pollution has become a major issue in the modern megalopolis because of industrial emissions and increasing urbanization along with traffic jams and the heating/cooling of buildings. Monitoring urban air quality is therefore required by municipalities and the civil society. Current monitoring systems rely on reference sensing stations that are precise but massive, costly, and, therefore, seldom. In this paper, we focus on an alternative or complementary approach, with a network of low cost and autonomic wireless sensors, aiming at a finer spatiotemporal granularity of sensing. Generic deployment models in the literature are not adapted to the stochastic nature of pollution sensing. Our main contribution is to design integer linear programming models that compute sensor deployments capturing both the coverage of pollution under time-varying weather conditions and the connectivity of the infrastructure. We evaluate our deployment models on a real data set of Greater London. We analyze the performance of the proposed models and show that our joint coverage and connectivity formulation is tight and compact, with a reasonable enough execution time. We also conduct extensive simulations to derive engineering insights for effective deployments of air pollution sensors in an urban environment.

[1]  Bijaya K. Panigrahi,et al.  Multi-objective node deployment in WSNs: In search of an optimal trade-off among coverage, lifetime, energy consumption, and connectivity , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Coverage and Connectivity Issues in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005 .

[3]  Adnan Abu-Dayya,et al.  Wireless sensor network for real-time air pollution monitoring , 2013, 2013 1st International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA).

[4]  Mihaela Cardei,et al.  Energy-Efficient Range Assignment in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC'06).

[5]  S. Venkatesan,et al.  Energy efficient sensor, relay and base station placements for coverage, connectivity and routing , 2005, PCCC 2005. 24th IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, 2005..

[6]  Mohamed F. Younis,et al.  Strategies and techniques for node placement in wireless sensor networks: A survey , 2008, Ad Hoc Networks.

[7]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Grid Coverage for Surveillance and Target Location in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[8]  I. K. Altinel,et al.  Binary integer programming formulation and heuristics for differentiated coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[9]  Guangjie Han,et al.  A survey on coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks , 2012, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[10]  Hichem Snoussi,et al.  Sensor deployment optimization methods to achieve both coverage and connectivity in wireless sensor networks , 2015, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  R.N. Murty,et al.  CitySense: An Urban-Scale Wireless Sensor Network and Testbed , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security.

[12]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Wireless sensor network survey , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Milind Dawande,et al.  Energy efficient schemes for wireless sensor networks with multiple mobile base stations , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[14]  Andrea Lodi,et al.  MIPLIB 2010 , 2011, Math. Program. Comput..

[15]  Maurizio Rebaudengo,et al.  A Mobile and Low-Cost System for Environmental Monitoring: A Case Study , 2016, Sensors.

[16]  Hervé Rivano,et al.  Optimal Deployment of Wireless Sensor Networks for Air Pollution Monitoring , 2015, 2015 24th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).

[17]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[18]  Jesús María Latorre Canteli,et al.  Tight and compact MILP formulation of start-up and shut-down ramping in unit commitment , 2013, PES 2013.

[19]  Andres Ramos,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulation of Start-Up and Shut-Down Ramping in Unit Commitment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Dynamic Coverage of Mobile Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[21]  Cem Ersoy,et al.  Wireless sensor network lifetime maximization by optimal sensor deployment, activity scheduling, data routing and sink mobility , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[22]  Jesús María Latorre Canteli,et al.  Tight and compact MILP formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2013 .

[23]  John M. Stockie,et al.  The Mathematics of Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling , 2011, SIAM Rev..

[24]  A. Daly,et al.  Air Pollution Modeling - An Overview , 2007 .